Literature DB >> 21302802

Failure mode and effect analysis-based quality assurance for dynamic MLC tracking systems.

Amit Sawant1, Sonja Dieterich, Michelle Svatos, Paul Keall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and implement a failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)-based commissioning and quality assurance framework for dynamic multileaf collimator (DMLC) tumor tracking systems.
METHODS: A systematic failure mode and effect analysis was performed for a prototype real-time tumor tracking system that uses implanted electromagnetic transponders for tumor position monitoring and a DMLC for real-time beam adaptation. A detailed process tree of DMLC tracking delivery was created and potential tracking-specific failure modes were identified. For each failure mode, a risk probability number (RPN) was calculated from the product of the probability of occurrence, the severity of effect, and the detectibility of the failure. Based on the insights obtained from the FMEA, commissioning and QA procedures were developed to check (i) the accuracy of coordinate system transformation, (ii) system latency, (iii) spatial and dosimetric delivery accuracy, (iv) delivery efficiency, and (v) accuracy and consistency of system response to error conditions. The frequency of testing for each failure mode was determined from the RPN value.
RESULTS: Failures modes with RPN > or = 125 were recommended to be tested monthly. Failure modes with RPN < 125 were assigned to be tested during comprehensive evaluations, e.g., during commissioning, annual quality assurance, and after major software/hardware upgrades. System latency was determined to be approximately 193 ms. The system showed consistent and accurate response to erroneous conditions. Tracking accuracy was within 3%-3 mm gamma (100% pass rate) for sinusoidal as well as a wide variety of patient-derived respiratory motions. The total time taken for monthly QA was approximately 35 min, while that taken for comprehensive testing was approximately 3.5 h.
CONCLUSIONS: FMEA proved to be a powerful and flexible tool to develop and implement a quality management (QM) framework for DMLC tracking. The authors conclude that the use of FMEA-based QM ensures efficient allocation of clinical resources because the most critical failure modes receive the most attention. It is expected that the set of guidelines proposed here will serve as a living document that is updated with the accumulation of progressively more intrainstitutional and interinstitutional experience with DMLC tracking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21302802      PMCID: PMC3016096          DOI: 10.1118/1.3517837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  24 in total

1.  Using health care Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: the VA National Center for Patient Safety's prospective risk analysis system.

Authors:  Joseph DeRosier; Erik Stalhandske; James P Bagian; Tina Nudell
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2002-05

2.  Failure mode and effects analysis. A hands-on guide for healthcare facilities.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Devices       Date:  2004-07

3.  Tools for developing a quality management program: proactive tools (process mapping, value stream mapping, fault tree analysis, and failure mode and effects analysis).

Authors:  Frank Rath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  IMRT delivery performance with a varian multileaf collimator.

Authors:  Thomas Losasso
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Cyberknife image-guided delivery and quality assurance.

Authors:  Sonja Dieterich; Todd Pawlicki
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40.

Authors:  G J Kutcher; L Coia; M Gillin; W F Hanson; S Leibel; R J Morton; J R Palta; J A Purdy; L E Reinstein; G K Svensson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Electromagnetic-guided dynamic multileaf collimator tracking enables motion management for intensity-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Amit Sawant; Byungchul Cho; Dan Ruan; Junqing Wu; Per Poulsen; Jay Petersen; Laurence J Newell; Herbert Cattell; Stine Korreman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  An analysis of thoracic and abdominal tumour motion for stereotactic body radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  Yelin Suh; Sonja Dieterich; Byungchul Cho; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Management of three-dimensional intrafraction motion through real-time DMLC tracking.

Authors:  Amit Sawant; Raghu Venkat; Vikram Srivastava; David Carlson; Sergey Povzner; Herb Cattell; Paul Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  A method for evaluating quality assurance needs in radiation therapy.

Authors:  M Saiful Huq; Benedick A Fraass; Peter B Dunscombe; John P Gibbons; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Paul M Medin; Arno Mundt; Sassa Mutic; Jatinder R Palta; Bruce R Thomadsen; Jeffrey F Williamson; Ellen D Yorke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  18 in total

1.  Technical Note: In silico and experimental evaluation of two leaf-fitting algorithms for MLC tracking based on exposure error and plan complexity.

Authors:  Vincent Caillet; Ricky O'Brien; Douglas Moore; Per Poulsen; Tobias Pommer; Emma Colvill; Amit Sawant; Jeremy Booth; Paul Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The first clinical implementation of electromagnetic transponder-guided MLC tracking.

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Emma Colvill; Ricky O'Brien; Jin Aun Ng; Per Rugaard Poulsen; Thomas Eade; Andrew Kneebone; Jeremy T Booth
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management.

Authors:  M Saiful Huq; Benedick A Fraass; Peter B Dunscombe; John P Gibbons; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Arno J Mundt; Sasa Mutic; Jatinder R Palta; Frank Rath; Bruce R Thomadsen; Jeffrey F Williamson; Ellen D Yorke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  An FMEA evaluation of intensity modulated radiation therapy dose delivery failures at tolerance criteria levels.

Authors:  Jacqueline Tonigan Faught; Peter A Balter; Jennifer L Johnson; Stephen F Kry; Laurence E Court; Francesco C Stingo; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Effect of MLC tracking latency on conformal volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans in 4D stereotactic lung treatment.

Authors:  James L Bedford; Martin F Fast; Simeon Nill; Fiona M A McDonald; Merina Ahmed; Vibeke N Hansen; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Quantitative evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of stereotactic radiotherapy with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system using statistical modeling.

Authors:  Vance Keeling; Sabbir Hossain; Hosang Jin; Ozer Algan; Salahuddin Ahmad; Imad Ali
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Failure mode and effects analysis: A community practice perspective.

Authors:  Bradley W Schuller; Angi Burns; Elizabeth A Ceilley; Alan King; Joan LeTourneau; Alexander Markovic; Lynda Sterkel; Brigid Taplin; Jennifer Wanner; Jeffrey M Albert
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 8.  Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART) Strategies and Technical Considerations: A State of the ART Review From NRG Oncology.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Percy Lee; Adam D Yock; Jeffrey R Olsen; Minsong Cao; Farzan Siddiqui; William Parker; Anthony Doemer; Yi Rong; Amar U Kishan; Stanley H Benedict; X Allen Li; Beth A Erickson; Jason W Sohn; Ying Xiao; Evan Wuthrick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Application of failure mode and effects analysis to treatment planning in scanned proton beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marie Claire Cantone; Mario Ciocca; Francesco Dionisi; Piero Fossati; Stefano Lorentini; Marco Krengli; Silvia Molinelli; Roberto Orecchia; Marco Schwarz; Ivan Veronese; Viviana Vitolo
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Application of failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to pretreatment phases in tomotherapy.

Authors:  Sara Broggi; Marie Claire Cantone; Anna Chiara; Nadia Di Muzio; Barbara Longobardi; Paola Mangili; Ivan Veronese
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.