Literature DB >> 18406910

Cyberknife image-guided delivery and quality assurance.

Sonja Dieterich1, Todd Pawlicki.   

Abstract

The CyberKnife is a complex, emerging technology that is a significant departure from current stereotactic radiosurgery and external beam radiotherapy technologies. In its clinical application and quality assurance (QA) approach, the CyberKnife is currently situated somewhere in between stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy. The clinical QA for this image-guided treatment delivery system typically follows the vendor's guidance, mainly because of the current lack of vendor-independent QA recommendations. The problem has been exacerbated because very little published data are available for QA for the CyberKnife system, especially for QA of the interaction between individual system components. The tools and techniques for QA of the CyberKnife are under development and will continue to improve with longer clinical experience of the users. The technology itself continues to evolve, forcing continuous changes and adaptation of QA. To aid in the process of developing comprehensive guidance on CyberKnife QA, a database of errors based on users reporting incidents and corrective actions would be desirable. The goal of this work was to discuss the status of QA guidelines in the clinical implementation of the CyberKnife system. This investigation was done from the perspective of an active clinical and research site using the CyberKnife.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18406910     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

1.  Verification of MLC based real-time tumor tracking using an electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  Sarah Han-Oh; Byong Yong Yi; Fritz Lerma; Barry L Berman; Minzhi Gui; Cedric Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiosurgical treatment planning of AVM following embolization with Onyx: possible dosage error in treatment planning can be averted.

Authors:  Natan Shtraus; Dan Schifter; Benjamin W Corn; Shimon Maimon; Shlomi Alani; Vladimir Frolov; Diana Matceyevsky; Andrew A Kanner
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Assessment of image-guided CyberKnife radiosurgery for metastatic spine tumors.

Authors:  Jo-Ting Tsai; Jia-Wei Lin; Wen-Ta Chiu; Woei-Chyn Chu
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Failure mode and effect analysis-based quality assurance for dynamic MLC tracking systems.

Authors:  Amit Sawant; Sonja Dieterich; Michelle Svatos; Paul Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  American College of Radiology (ACR) and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Practice Guideline for the Performance of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS).

Authors:  Steven K Seung; David A Larson; James M Galvin; Minesh P Mehta; Louis Potters; Christopher J Schultz; Santosh V Yajnik; Alan C Hartford; Seth A Rosenthal
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 6.  Radiotherapy: Basic Concepts and Recent Advances.

Authors:  S R Mehta; V Suhag; M Semwal; N Sharma
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

7.  Survival outcomes of patients treated with hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy for parotid gland tumors: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Sana D Karam; James W Snider; Hongkun Wang; Margaux Wooster; Christopher Lominska; John Deeken; Kenneth Newkirk; Bruce Davidson; K William Harter
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  A dosimetric comparison of real-time adaptive and non-adaptive radiotherapy: A multi-institutional study encompassing robotic, gimbaled, multileaf collimator and couch tracking.

Authors:  Emma Colvill; Jeremy Booth; Simeon Nill; Martin Fast; James Bedford; Uwe Oelfke; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Per Poulsen; Esben Worm; Rune Hansen; Thomas Ravkilde; Jonas Scherman Rydhög; Tobias Pommer; Per Munck Af Rosenschold; Stephanie Lang; Matthias Guckenberger; Christian Groh; Christian Herrmann; Dirk Verellen; Kenneth Poels; Lei Wang; Michael Hadsell; Thilo Sothmann; Oliver Blanck; Paul Keall
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Flattening filter-free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group.

Authors:  Ying Xiao; Stephen F Kry; Richard Popple; Ellen Yorke; Niko Papanikolaou; Sotirios Stathakis; Ping Xia; Saiful Huq; John Bayouth; James Galvin; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Dosimetric comparison between cone/Iris-based and InCise MLC-based CyberKnife plans for single and multiple brain metastases.

Authors:  Si Young Jang; Ron Lalonde; Cihat Ozhasoglu; Steven Burton; Dwight Heron; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.