Literature DB >> 21301903

Biomechanical analysis of alveolar bone stress around implants with different thread designs and pitches in the mandibular molar area.

Ting-Hsun Lan1, Je-Kang Du, Chin-Yun Pan, Huey-Er Lee, Wei-Hao Chung.   

Abstract

Threaded implants have been shown to play an important role in increasing mechanical osseointegration. The aim of this study was to determine bone stress distribution when using different types of implant thread pitches and designs. Five 3D finite element models were constructed to simulate bone stresses induced in implant bodies with two types of thread form: triangular ("Tri" prefix) and trapezoidal ("Trap" prefix). The former had thread pitches of 0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 mm, while the latter had thread pitches of 1.2 and 1.6 mm. A biting load of 143 N was applied vertically and obliquely to the occlusal central fossa of the crown. The main effects of each level of the three factors investigated (loading type, pitch, and thread form) in terms of the stress value were computed for all models. Results indicated that the loading type was the main factor of influence on the peak compressive stress of the alveolar bone. Optimal thread pitch was 1.2 mm for a triangular-thread implant, and a trapezoidal-threaded implant with thread pitch of 1.6 mm had the lowest stress value among trapezoidal-threaded implants. This study concluded that each thread form has its unique optimal thread pitch with regard to lower concentration of bone stress. Clinically, this study suggests that in biomechanical consideration, thread pitch exceeding 0.8 mm is more appropriate for a screwed implant. For clinical cases that require greater bone-implant interface, trapezoidal-threaded implants with thread pitch of 1.6 mm provide greater primary stability and lower concentration of bone stress under different loading directions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21301903     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0517-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of the effect of the residual bone angulation on implant-supported fixed prosthesis in mandibular posterior edentulism. Part II: 3-D finite element stress analysis.

Authors:  K Akça; H Iplikçioğlu
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.454

2.  Influence of cortical bone quality on stress distribution in bone around dental implant.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kitagawa; Yasuhiro Tanimoto; Kimiya Nemoto; Masahiro Aida
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  The tissue, cellular, and molecular regulation of orthodontic tooth movement: 100 years after Carl Sandstedt.

Authors:  Murray C Meikle
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Chun-Li Lin; Jen-Chyan Wang; Wen-Jen Chang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Oğuz Eraslan; Ozgür Inan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants for single-tooth replacement.

Authors:  A Schmitt; G A Zarb
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits.

Authors:  Jennifer Steigenga; Khalaf Al-Shammari; Carl Misch; Francisco H Nociti; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function.

Authors:  U Brägger; S Aeschlimann; W Bürgin; C H Hämmerle; N P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Bite force and oral function in patients with osseointegrated oral implants.

Authors:  T Haraldson; G E Carlsson
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1977-03

10.  Effects of implant geometry and surface treatment on osseointegration after functional loading: a dog study.

Authors:  S H Chung; S J Heo; J Y Koak; S K Kim; J B Lee; J S Han; C H Han; I C Rhyu; S J Lee
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.837

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration.

Authors:  A Barfeie; J Wilson; J Rees
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  The influence of thread geometry on implant osseointegration under immediate loading: a literature review.

Authors:  Hyo-Sook Ryu; Cheol Namgung; Jong-Ho Lee; Young-Jun Lim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Relevant Aspects of Titanium and Zirconia Dental Implants for Their Fatigue and Osseointegration Behaviors.

Authors:  Javier Aragoneses; Nansi Lopez Valverde; Manuel Fernandez-Dominguez; Jesús Mena-Alvarez; Cinthia Rodriguez; Javier Gil; Juan Manuel Aragoneses
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 4.  Current trends in dental implants.

Authors:  Laura Gaviria; John Paul Salcido; Teja Guda; Joo L Ong
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-04-28

5.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a passive and friction fit implant abutment interface and the influence of occlusal table dimension on the stress distribution pattern on the implant and surrounding bone.

Authors:  Hasan Sarfaraz; Anoopa Paulose; K Kamalakanth Shenoy; Akhter Hussain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

6.  Influence of three different implant thread designs on stress distribution: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Mansi Manish Oswal; Ulhas N Amasi; Manish S Oswal; Ashish S Bhagat
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

7.  Influence of Implant Design (Cylindrical and Conical) in the Load Transfer Surrounding Long (13mm) and Short (7mm) Length Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis.

Authors:  Sergio Alexandre Gehrke; Victor Lourenço Frugis; Jamil Awad Shibli; Maria Piedad Ramirez Fernandez; José Eduardo Maté Sánchez de Val; José Luis Calvo Girardo; Silvio Taschieri; Stefano Corbella
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2016-09-30

8.  The effect of osseodensification and different thread designs on the dental implant primary stability.

Authors:  Abdullah Saleh Almutairi; Maher Abdullatif Walid; Mohamed Ahmed Alkhodary
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-12-05

9.  Relevant Design Aspects to Improve the Stability of Titanium Dental Implants.

Authors:  M Herrero-Climent; P López-Jarana; B F Lemos; F J Gil; C Falcão; J V Ríos-Santos; B Ríos-Carrasco
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Influence of Implant Thread Morphology on Primary Stability: A Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Maria Menini; Francesco Bagnasco; Ivan Calimodio; Nicolò Di Tullio; Francesca Delucchi; Domenico Baldi; Francesco Pera
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.