Literature DB >> 19543925

The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis.

Oğuz Eraslan1, Ozgür Inan.   

Abstract

The biomechanical behavior of implant thread plays an important role on stresses at implant-bone interface. Information about the effect of different thread profiles upon the bone stresses is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different implant thread designs on stress distribution characteristics at supporting structures. In this study, three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) stress-analysis method was used. Four types of 3D mathematical models simulating four different thread-form configurations for a solid screw implant was prepared with supporting bone structure. V-thread (1), buttress (2), reverse buttress (3), and square thread designs were simulated. A 100-N static axial occlusal load was applied to occlusal surface of abutment to calculate the stress distributions. Solidworks/Cosmosworks structural analysis programs were used for FE modeling/analysis. The analysis of the von Mises stress values revealed that maximum stress concentrations were located at loading areas of implant abutments and cervical cortical bone regions for all models. Stress concentration at cortical bone (18.3 MPa) was higher than spongious bone (13.3 MPa), and concentration of first thread (18 MPa) was higher than other threads (13.3 MPa). It was seen that, while the von Mises stress distribution patterns at different implant thread models were similar, the concentration of compressive stresses were different. The present study showed that the use of different thread form designs did not affect the von Mises concentration at supporting bone structure. However, the compressive stress concentrations differ by various thread profiles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19543925     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0305-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  19 in total

Review 1.  In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface.

Authors:  J B Brunski
Journal:  Adv Dent Res       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  LaminOss immediate-load implants: I. Introducing osteocompression in dentistry.

Authors:  M Valen; W M Locante
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations.

Authors:  H S Yang; L A Lang; A Molina; D A Felton
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.

Authors:  Mauro Cruz; Thomaz Wassall; Elson Magalhães Toledo; Luis Paulo da Silva Barra; Afonso Celso de Castro Lemonge
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis.

Authors:  H-J Chun; S-Y Cheong; J-H Han; S-J Heo; J-P Chung; I-C Rhyu; Y-C Choi; H-K Baik; Y Ku; M-H Kim
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.837

6.  Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post.

Authors:  A Pegoretti; L Fambri; G Zappini; M Bianchetti
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Liang Kong; Kaijin Hu; Dehua Li; Yingliang Song; Jin Yang; Ziyan Wu; Baolin Liu
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  A finite element analysis of the human temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  J Chen; L Xu
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  The relationship between endosteal implant design and function: maximum stress distribution with computer-formed, three dimensional Flexi-Cup blades.

Authors:  M Valen
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  A model for the implant-bone interface characteristics of porous dental implants.

Authors:  S D Cook; J J Klawitter; A M Weinstein
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 6.116

View more
  18 in total

1.  Histomorphometric analysis of microcrack healing after the installation of mini-implants.

Authors:  Soobin Shin; Pan-Soo Park; Seung-Hak Baek; Il-Hyung Yang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  Biomechanical role of peri-implant trabecular structures during vertical loading.

Authors:  Takashi Ohashi; Satoru Matsunaga; Ken Nakahara; Shinichi Abe; Yoshinobu Ide; Yuichi Tamatsu; Naoki Takano
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Biomechanical analysis of alveolar bone stress around implants with different thread designs and pitches in the mandibular molar area.

Authors:  Ting-Hsun Lan; Je-Kang Du; Chin-Yun Pan; Huey-Er Lee; Wei-Hao Chung
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  The influence of thread geometry on implant osseointegration under immediate loading: a literature review.

Authors:  Hyo-Sook Ryu; Cheol Namgung; Jong-Ho Lee; Young-Jun Lim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Effect of thread depth and thread pitch on the primary stability of miniscrews receiving a torque load : A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yushan Ye; Weimin Yi; Song Fan; Luodan Zhao; Yansong Yu; Yingjuan Lu; Qinghe Yao; Wei Wang; Shaohai Chang
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 6.  Precision medicine using patient-specific modelling: state of the art and perspectives in dental practice.

Authors:  Pierre Lahoud; Reinhilde Jacobs; Philippe Boisse; Mostafa EzEldeen; Maxime Ducret; Raphael Richert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.606

7.  Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Qing Wang; Yuan Zhang; Min Pang; Yue-Qiu Wang; Jun Yuan; Hui Peng; Wen Zhang; Lu Dai; Hong-Wei Li
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Rapid manufacturing of micro-drilling devices using FFF-type 3D printing technology.

Authors:  Sangyeun Park; Byeongjo Ko; Heewon Lee; Hongyun So
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Current trends in dental implants.

Authors:  Laura Gaviria; John Paul Salcido; Teja Guda; Joo L Ong
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-04-28

10.  The influence of thread geometry on biomechanical load transfer to bone: A finite element analysis comparing two implant thread designs.

Authors:  Manisha G Herekar; Viraj N Patil; Shahnawaz S Mulani; Megha Sethi; Omkar Padhye
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.