Literature DB >> 21289348

Many physicians are willing to use patients' electronic personal health records, but doctors differ by location, gender, and practice.

Matthew K Wynia1, Gretchen Williams Torres, Josh Lemieux.   

Abstract

Electronic personal health records could become important tools for patients to use in managing and monitoring their health information and communicating with clinicians. With the emergence of new products and federal incentives that might indirectly encourage greater use of personal health records, policy makers should understand the views of physicians on using these records. In a national survey of physicians in 2008-09, we found that although 64 percent have never used a patient's electronic personal health record, 42 percent would be willing to try. Strikingly, rural physicians expressed much more willingness to use such records compared to urban or suburban physicians. Female physicians were significantly less willing to use these tools than their male peers (34 percent versus 46 percent). Physicians broadly have concerns about the impact on patients' privacy, the accuracy of underlying data, their potential liability for tracking all of the information that might be entered into a personal health record, and the lack of payment to clinicians for using or reviewing these patient records.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21289348     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  22 in total

Review 1.  What do we know about developing patient portals? a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Terese Otte-Trojel; Antoinette de Bont; Thomas G Rundall; Joris van de Klundert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Free Web-based personal health records: an analysis of functionality.

Authors:  José Luis Fernández-Alemán; Carlos Luis Seva-Llor; Ambrosio Toval; Sofia Ouhbi; Luis Fernández-Luque
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Testing the Electronic Personal Health Record Acceptance Model by Nurses for Managing Their Own Health: A Cross-sectional Survey.

Authors:  K Gartrell; A M Trinkoff; C L Storr; M L Wilson; A P Gurses
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  The effect of information technology on hospital performance.

Authors:  Cynthia Williams; Yara Asi; Amanda Raffenaud; Matt Bagwell; Ibrahim Zeini
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2015-05-28

5.  A classification of errors in lay comprehension of medical documents.

Authors:  Alla Keselman; Catherine Arnott Smith
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Diffusion and Use of Tethered Personal Health Records in Primary Care.

Authors:  Taylor Pressler Vydra; Edward Cuaresma; Matthew Kretovics; Seuli Bose-Brill
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2015-04-01

7.  Potential of personal health record portals in the care of individuals with spinal cord injuries and disorders: Provider perspectives.

Authors:  Jennifer N Hill; Bridget M Smith; Frances M Weaver; Kim M Nazi; Florian P Thomas; Barry Goldstein; Timothy P Hogan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  The patients' active role in managing a personal electronic health record: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Ines Baudendistel; Eva Winkler; Martina Kamradt; Sarah Brophy; Gerda Längst; Felicitas Eckrich; Oliver Heinze; Bjoern Bergh; Joachim Szecsenyi; Dominik Ose
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  A qualitative study of how patients with type 2 diabetes use an electronic stand-alone personal health record.

Authors:  Kevin T Fuji; Amy A Abbott; Kimberly A Galt
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.536

10.  Consideration of patient preferences and challenges in storage and access of pharmacogenetic test results.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Kensaku Kawamoto; Robert Agans; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.