Literature DB >> 21673581

Consideration of patient preferences and challenges in storage and access of pharmacogenetic test results.

Susanne B Haga1, Kensaku Kawamoto, Robert Agans, Geoffrey S Ginsburg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pharmacogenetic testing is one of the primary drivers of personalized medicine. The use of pharmacogenetic testing may provide a lifetime of benefits through tailoring drug dosing and selection of multiple medications to improve therapeutic outcomes and reduce adverse responses. We aimed to assess public interest and concerns regarding sharing and storage of pharmacogenetic test results that would facilitate the reuse of pharmacogenetic data across a lifetime of care.
METHODS: We conducted a random-digit-dial phone survey of a sample of the US public.
RESULTS: We achieved an overall response rate of 42% (n = 1139). Most respondents indicated that they were extremely or somewhat comfortable allowing their pharmacogenetic test results to be shared with other doctors involved in their care management (90% ± 2.18%); significantly fewer respondents (74% ± 3.27%) indicated that they were extremely or somewhat comfortable sharing results with their pharmacist (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Patients, pharmacists, and physicians will all be critical players in the pharmacotherapy process. Patients are supportive of sharing pharmacogenetic test results with physicians and pharmacists and personally maintaining their test results. However, further study is needed to understand which options are needed for sharing, appropriate storage, and patient education about the relevance of pharmacogenetic test results to promote consideration of this information by other prescribing practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21673581      PMCID: PMC3731746          DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31822077a5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  45 in total

1.  Exploring elements of interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and physicians in medication review.

Authors:  Timothy F Chen; Abilio C de Almeida Neto
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2007-05-04

2.  The importance of including topics related to pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics, and medical genetics in the pharmacy curriculum.

Authors:  Sam Harirforoosh; Lawrence Fleckenstein; Pramod Mahajan; Okezie I Aruoma; Ying Huang; Majid Moridani
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  A preliminary look at duplicate testing associated with lack of electronic health record interoperability for transferred patients.

Authors:  Bridget A Stewart; Susan Fernandes; Elizabeth Rodriguez-Huertas; Michael Landzberg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Development and implementation of a pharmacist-managed clinical pharmacogenetics service.

Authors:  Kristine R Crews; Shane J Cross; John N McCormick; Donald K Baker; Alejandro R Molinelli; Richard Mullins; Mary V Relling; James M Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.637

5.  Missing prenatal records at a birth center: a communication problem quantified.

Authors:  Donald W Miller; John D Yeast; Robin L Evans
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

6.  Pharmacist-led, interdisciplinary model for delivery of supportive care in the ambulatory cancer clinic setting.

Authors:  John Valgus; Sandra Jarr; Robert Schwartz; Michelle Rice; Stephen A Bernard
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  A required course in human genomics, pharmacogenomics, and bioinformatics.

Authors:  Daniel A Brazeau; Gayle A Brazeau
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Perceptions of patients on Medicare Part D medication therapy management services.

Authors:  Hoai-An Truong; Cherokee Layson-Wolf; Magaly Rodriguez de Bittner; James A Owen; Sheri Haupt
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2009 May-Jun

9.  Older African Americans' perceptions of pharmacists.

Authors:  Sharon L Youmans; Dean Schillinger; Edward Mamary; Anita Stewart
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.847

10.  Physician-patient and pharmacist-patient communication: geriatrics' perceptions and opinions.

Authors:  Flora Keshishian; Nancy Colodny; R Thomas Boone
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-03-04
View more
  13 in total

1.  Assessment of patient perceptions of genomic testing to inform pharmacogenomic implementation.

Authors:  Yee Ming Lee; Ryan P McKillip; Brittany A Borden; Catherine E Klammer; Mark J Ratain; Peter H O'Donnell
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Opinions, hopes and concerns regarding pharmacogenomics: a comparison of healthy individuals, heart failure patients and heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  K Lachance; S Korol; E O'Meara; A Ducharme; N Racine; M Liszkowski; J L Rouleau; G B Pelletier; M Carrier; M White; S de Denus
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Clinical delivery of pharmacogenetic testing services: a proposed partnership between genetic counselors and pharmacists.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 4.  A proposed approach to accelerate evidence generation for genomic-based technologies in the context of a learning health system.

Authors:  Christine Y Lu; Marc S Williams; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Sengwee Toh; Jeff S Brown; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Implementation of personalized medicine services in community pharmacies: perceptions of independent community pharmacists.

Authors:  Katelyn M Alexander; Holly S Divine; Cathy R Hanna; Yevgeniya Gokun; Patricia R Freeman
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

6.  Examining perceptions of the usefulness and usability of a mobile-based system for pharmacogenomics clinical decision support: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Kathrin Blagec; Katrina M Romagnoli; Richard D Boyce; Matthias Samwald
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Practical application of opt-out recruitment methods in two health services research studies.

Authors:  Christopher J Miller; James F Burgess; Ellen P Fischer; Deborah J Hodges; Lindsay K Belanger; Jessica M Lipschitz; Siena R Easley; Christopher J Koenig; Regina L Stanley; Jeffrey M Pyne
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Pharmacogenomics in children: advantages and challenges of next generation sequencing applications.

Authors:  O M Vanakker; A De Paepe
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2013-01-17

9.  Patient insights on features of an effective pharmacogenomics patient portal.

Authors:  Tien M Truong; Elizabeth Lipschultz; Emily Schierer; Keith Danahey; Mark J Ratain; Peter H O'Donnell
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Delivering pharmacogenetic testing in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; Deepak Voora; Bruce Peyser; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2013-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.