BACKGROUND: Patient use of personal health records (PHRs) to manage their health information has been proposed to enhance patient knowledge and empower patients to make changes in their self-care behaviors. However, there remains a gap in understanding about patients' actual PHR use behaviors. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how patients with type 2 diabetes used a PHR to manage their diabetes-related health information for self-care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with type 2 diabetes were interviewed 3-6 months after receiving initial training on a free-of-charge, Web-based PHR. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using an iterative process of in vivo coding, categorization, and theme development. RESULTS: Nine themes emerged, three of which expressed positive experiences: complete and accessible record; increased awareness; and behavioral changes. The remaining six themes expressed negative experiences: out of sight, out of mind; I would have used it if I were sicker; economic, infrastructure, and computer literacy barriers; lack of patient-provider engagement; double tracking; and privacy and security concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some potential positive benefits resulting from PHR use, several barriers inhibited sustained and effective use over time. Provider and patient education about the benefits of PHR use and about the potential for filling in information gaps in the provider-based record is key to engage patients and stimulate PHR adoption and use.
BACKGROUND:Patient use of personal health records (PHRs) to manage their health information has been proposed to enhance patient knowledge and empower patients to make changes in their self-care behaviors. However, there remains a gap in understanding about patients' actual PHR use behaviors. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how patients with type 2 diabetes used a PHR to manage their diabetes-related health information for self-care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with type 2 diabetes were interviewed 3-6 months after receiving initial training on a free-of-charge, Web-based PHR. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using an iterative process of in vivo coding, categorization, and theme development. RESULTS: Nine themes emerged, three of which expressed positive experiences: complete and accessible record; increased awareness; and behavioral changes. The remaining six themes expressed negative experiences: out of sight, out of mind; I would have used it if I were sicker; economic, infrastructure, and computer literacy barriers; lack of patient-provider engagement; double tracking; and privacy and security concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some potential positive benefits resulting from PHR use, several barriers inhibited sustained and effective use over time. Provider and patient education about the benefits of PHR use and about the potential for filling in information gaps in the provider-based record is key to engage patients and stimulate PHR adoption and use.
Entities:
Keywords:
e-health; medical records; mobile health; technology
Authors: James D Ralston; Katie Coleman; Robert J Reid; Matthew R Handley; Eric B Larson Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Matthew J Witry; William R Doucette; Jeanette M Daly; Barcey T Levy; Elizabeth A Chrischilles Journal: Perspect Health Inf Manag Date: 2010-01-01
Authors: David C Kaelber; Ashish K Jha; Douglas Johnston; Blackford Middleton; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: James D Ralston; Irl B Hirsch; James Hoath; Mary Mullen; Allen Cheadle; Harold I Goldberg Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Patricia Rodríguez-Fortúnez; Josep Franch-Nadal; José A Fornos-Pérez; Fernando Martínez-Martínez; Hector David de Paz; María Luisa Orera-Peña Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-22 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Emma Simpson; Richard Brown; Elizabeth Sillence; Lynne Coventry; Karen Lloyd; Jo Gibbs; Shema Tariq; Abigail C Durrant Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-11-23
Authors: M van Vugt; M de Wit; F Sieverink; Y Roelofsen; S H Hendriks; H J G Bilo; F J Snoek Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 4.011