Literature DB >> 8376214

Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state.

E C Levi1, R C Folsom, R A Dobie.   

Abstract

Scalp responses to continuous amplitude-modulated (AM) tones were recorded from adults and 1-month-old infants. The amplitude-modulation following (or envelope) response (AMFR) was quantified using magnitude-squared coherence. This measurement indicates the strength of the frequency-following response relative to background neural noise. The optimal modulation rate for generating the AMFR was determined by studying the effects of stimulus modulation rate on the response. Stimulus AM rate was varied between 10 and 80 Hz for continuous tonal stimuli of 500 Hz, and between 20 and 80 Hz for continuous tonal stimuli of 2000 Hz. Optimal modulation rate was defined as the AM rate that provided the highest coherence estimate. Adult AMFR coherence increased between 10 and 40 Hz (20-40 Hz for 2000 Hz), and decreased between 40 and 80 Hz in both carrier frequency conditions. Infant AMFR coherence, in contrast, monotonically increased between 10 and 80 H (20-80 Hz for 2000 Hz). Thus, within the frequency range examined, 40 Hz is optimal for generating the AMFR in adults, whereas 80 Hz is optimal in infants. Adults were tested while awake and infants were tested during periods of sleep. Given the observed age difference in effective modulation rate, we examined modulation rate effects in a group of adults in both awake and sedated states. As in sleeping infants, 80 Hz was optimal for generating AMFRs in the sedated adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8376214     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90063-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

1.  Using the auditory steady state response to record response amplitude curves. A possible fast objective method for diagnosing dead regions.

Authors:  Timothy Wilding; Colette McKay; Richard Baker; Terence Picton; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Tone-evoked brainstem responses and auditory steady state responses to 40hz and 80hz amplitude modulated stimuli with different frequencies - a comparative study.

Authors:  Kaushlendra Kumar; Sujeet Kumar Sinha; Jayashree S Bhat
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-07-23

3.  Amplitude modulation detection and temporal modulation cutoff frequency in normal hearing infants.

Authors:  Brian A Walker; Caitlin M Gerhards; Lynne A Werner; David L Horn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The development of auditory temporal processing during the first year of life.

Authors:  Laurianne Cabrera; Bonnie K Lau
Journal:  Hearing Balance Commun       Date:  2022-02-02

5.  [Steady-state responses of the auditory system: a comparison of different methods].

Authors:  S Liebler; S Hoth; P K Plinkert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  The power of rhythms: how steady-state evoked responses reveal early neurocognitive development.

Authors:  Claire Kabdebon; Ana Fló; Adélaïde de Heering; Richard Aslin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 7.400

7.  Multiple-ASSR Interactions in Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Ieda M Ishida; David R Stapells
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25

8.  Age-Related Deficits in Electrophysiological and Behavioral Measures of Binaural Temporal Processing.

Authors:  Tess K Koerner; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Frederick J Gallun; Curtis J Billings
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.