Literature DB >> 21282282

Differential efficacy of three cycles of CMF followed by tamoxifen in patients with ER-positive and ER-negative tumors: long-term follow up on IBCSG Trial IX.

S Aebi1, Z Sun2, D Braun2, K N Price3, M Castiglione-Gertsch4, M Rabaglio5, R D Gelber6, D Crivellari7, J Lindtner8, R Snyder9, P Karlsson10, E Simoncini11, B A Gusterson12, G Viale13, M M Regan2, A S Coates14, A Goldhirsch15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive lymph node-negative breast cancer is being reassessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After stratification by ER status, 1669 postmenopausal patients with operable lymph node-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to three 28-day courses of 'classical' CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen for 57 months (CMF→tamoxifen) or to tamoxifen alone for 5 years.
RESULTS: ERs were positive in 81% of tumors. At a median follow-up of 13.1 years, patients with ER-positive breast cancers did not benefit from CMF [13-year disease-free survival (DFS) 64% CMF→tamoxifen, 66% tamoxifen; P = 0.99], whereas CMF substantially improved the prognosis of patients with ER-negative breast cancer (13-year DFS 73% versus 57%, P = 0.001). Similarly, breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) was identical in the ER-positive cohort but significantly improved by chemotherapy in the ER-negative cohort (13-year BCFI 80% versus 63%, P = 0.001). CMF had no influence on second nonbreast malignancies or deaths from other causes.
CONCLUSION: CMF is not beneficial in postmenopausal patients with node-negative ER-positive breast cancer but is highly effective within the ER-negative cohort. In the future, other markers of chemotherapy response may define a subset of patients with ER-positive tumors who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21282282      PMCID: PMC3202167          DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  23 in total

1.  Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Gong Tang; Steven Shak; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Wanseop Kim; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Drew Watson; John Bryant; Joseph P Costantino; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Clinical application of the 70-gene profile: the MINDACT trial.

Authors:  Fatima Cardoso; Laura Van't Veer; Emiel Rutgers; Sherene Loi; Stella Mook; Martine J Piccart-Gebhart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Re-evaluating adjuvant breast cancer trials: assessing hormone receptor status by immunohistochemical versus extraction assays.

Authors:  Meredith M Regan; Giuseppe Viale; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Eugenio Maiorano; Rastko Golouh; Antonino Carbone; Bob Brown; Mart Suurküla; Gerald Langman; Luca Mazzucchelli; Stephen Braye; Piergiovanni Grigolato; Richard D Gelber; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Karen N Price; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch; Barry Gusterson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Chemoendocrine compared with endocrine adjuvant therapies for node-negative breast cancer: predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors--International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Giuseppe Viale; Meredith M Regan; Eugenio Maiorano; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Rastko Golouh; Tiziana Perin; Robert W Brown; Anikó Kovács; Komala Pillay; Christian Ohlschlegel; Stephen Braye; Piergiovanni Grigolato; Tiziana Rusca; Richard D Gelber; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Karen N Price; Aron Goldhirsch; Barry A Gusterson; Alan S Coates
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Treatment of lymph-node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: long-term findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; John Bryant; Stewart Anderson; James Dignam; Edwin R Fisher; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Sep 4-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Predictive value of tumor Ki-67 expression in two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Viale; Meredith M Regan; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Fausto Maffini; Eugenio Maiorano; Marco Colleoni; Karen N Price; Rastko Golouh; Tiziana Perin; R W Brown; Anikó Kovács; Komala Pillay; Christian Ohlschlegel; Barry A Gusterson; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Richard D Gelber; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Patterns of treatment effects in subsets of patients in clinical trials.

Authors:  Marco Bonetti; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system.

Authors:  Clifford A Hudis; William E Barlow; Joseph P Costantino; Robert J Gray; Kathleen I Pritchard; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Joseph A Sparano; Sally Hunsberger; Rebecca A Enos; Richard D Gelber; Jo Anne Zujewski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Jim Ingle; Alan Coates; John Forbes; Judith Bliss; Marc Buyse; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Marco Colleoni; Charles Coombes; Claire Snowdon; Michael Gnant; Raimund Jakesz; Manfred Kaufmann; Francesco Boccardo; Jon Godwin; Christina Davies; Richard Peto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  International Web-based consultation on priorities for translational breast cancer research.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Aron Goldhirsch; Daniel F Hayes; Hans-Joerg Senn; William Wood; Giuseppe Viale
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  15 in total

1.  Lymph node metastasis and high serum CEA are important prognostic factors in hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Kosaka; Naoko Minatani; Yoko Tanaka; Akiko Shida; Mariko Kikuchi; Hiroshi Nishimiya; Mina Waraya; Hiroshi Katoh; Takeo Sato; Norihiko Sengoku; Hirokazu Tanino; Keishi Yamashita; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-09-13

2.  Can molecular subtyping replace axillary nodal status as prognostic marker in breast cancer?

Authors:  Debarshi Jana; Diptendra Kumar Sarkar; Suvro Ganguly; Abhirup Banerjee; Asim Kumar Manna; Syamsundar Mandal
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-04-06

3.  Prognosis of medullary breast cancer: analysis of 13 International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trials.

Authors:  J Huober; S Gelber; A Goldhirsch; A S Coates; G Viale; C Öhlschlegel; K N Price; R D Gelber; M M Regan; B Thürlimann
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Background Parenchymal Enhancement and Fibroglandular Tissue Proportion on Breast MRI: Correlation with Hormone Receptor Expression and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Mesut Öztürk; Ahmet Veysel Polat; Yurdanur Süllü; Leman Tomak; Ayfer Kamalı Polat
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2017-01-01

5.  Differential patterns of recurrence and specific survival between luminal A and luminal B breast cancer according to recent changes in the 2013 St Gallen immunohistochemical classification.

Authors:  A García Fernández; C Chabrera; M García Font; M Fraile; J M Lain; S Gónzalez; I Barco; C González; J Torres; M Piqueras; L Cirera; E Veloso; A Pessarrodona; N Giménez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Differential survival and recurrence patterns of patients operated for breast cancer according to the new immunohistochemical classification: analytical survey from 1997 to 2012.

Authors:  Antonio García Fernández; Carol Chabrera; Marc García Font; Manel Fraile; Sonia Gónzalez; Israel Barco; Clarisa González; Lluís Cirera; Enrique Veloso; José María Lain; Antoni Pessarrodona; Nuria Giménez
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-04-19

7.  Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; W C Wood; A S Coates; R D Gelber; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Do Patients with Luminal A Breast Cancer Profit from Adjuvant Systemic Therapy? A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Joachim Diessner; Manfred Wischnewsky; Maria Blettner; Sebastian Häusler; Wolfgang Janni; Rolf Kreienberg; Roland Stein; Tanja Stüber; Lukas Schwentner; Catharina Bartmann; Achim Wöckel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genes dysregulated to different extent or oppositely in estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Xianxiao Zhou; Tongwei Shi; Bailiang Li; Yuannv Zhang; Xiaopei Shen; Hongdong Li; Guini Hong; Chunyang Liu; Zheng Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prognostic interaction between expression of p53 and estrogen receptor in patients with node-negative breast cancer: results from IBCSG Trials VIII and IX.

Authors:  Alan S Coates; Ewan K A Millar; Sandra A O'Toole; Timothy J Molloy; Giuseppe Viale; Aron Goldhirsch; Meredith M Regan; Richard D Gelber; Zhuoxin Sun; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Barry Gusterson; Elizabeth A Musgrove; Robert L Sutherland
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.