Literature DB >> 15351193

Treatment of lymph-node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: long-term findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomised clinical trials.

Bernard Fisher1, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, John Bryant, Stewart Anderson, James Dignam, Edwin R Fisher, Norman Wolmark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-14 and B-20 trials showed that tamoxifen benefited women with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours and negative axillary nodes, and that chemotherapy plus tamoxifen was more effective than tamoxifen alone. We present long-term findings from those trials and relate them to age, menopausal status, and tumour oestrogen-receptor concentrations. We also discuss the extent of progress made in the treatment of such patients.
METHODS: B-14 patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n=1453) or tamoxifen (n=1439); B-20 patients to tamoxifen (n=788) or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and tamoxifen (CMFT, n=789). Primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival and overall survival estimated according to patients' age, menopausal status, and tumour oestrogen-receptor concentration. Smoothed recurrence rates were used to measure patterns of recurrence as a continuous function of age.
FINDINGS: Compared with placebo, tamoxifen benefited women in B-14 through 15 years, irrespective of age, menopausal status, or tumour oestrogen-receptor concentration (hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence-free survival 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.67, p<0.0001; HR for overall survival 0.80, 0.71-0.91, p=0.0008). In B-20, the benefit from CMFT over 12 years was greater than that from tamoxifen alone (HR for recurrence-free survival 0.52, 0.39-0.68, p<0.0001; HR for overall survival 0.78, 0.60-1.01, p=0.063). When CMFT was compared with placebo, there were reductions in treatment failure of about 65% in all age-groups.
INTERPRETATION: Much benefit has been achieved in treatment of women with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours and negative nodes. When planning systemic therapy for such patients of all ages, it should be understood that some have tumours with variable concentrations of oestrogen-receptors, a surrogate for other biomarkers associated with tumour growth and response to treatment. Older women tend to have higher tumour oestrogen-receptor concentrations and are more likely to benefit from tamoxifen than from chemotherapy; in younger women, the converse is true. Consequently, the notion that use of tamoxifen or chemotherapy should be based only on age is too restrictive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15351193     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16981-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  103 in total

1.  Editorial: gene expression profile assays as an aid in treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Chemoendocrine Treatment Is Standard in Hormone Receptor-Positive Patients.

Authors:  Volkmar Müller
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Node-Negative Breast Cancer: Which Patients Should Be Treated?

Authors:  Marcus Schmidt
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Differential efficacy of three cycles of CMF followed by tamoxifen in patients with ER-positive and ER-negative tumors: long-term follow up on IBCSG Trial IX.

Authors:  S Aebi; Z Sun; D Braun; K N Price; M Castiglione-Gertsch; M Rabaglio; R D Gelber; D Crivellari; J Lindtner; R Snyder; P Karlsson; E Simoncini; B A Gusterson; G Viale; M M Regan; A S Coates; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Long-term anti-inflammatory diet in relation to improved breast cancer prognosis: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kang Wang; Jia-Zheng Sun; Qian-Xue Wu; Zhu-Yue Li; Da-Xue Li; Yong-Fu Xiong; Guo-Chao Zhong; Yang Shi; Qing Li; Jiali Zheng; Nitin Shivappa; James R Hébert; Theodoros Foukakis; Xiang Zhang; Hong-Yuan Li; Ting-Xiu Xiang; Guo-Sheng Ren
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-08-13

Review 6.  Second malignancies after breast cancer: The impact of adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Chunhui Dong; Ling Chen
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-03

7.  Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Kathy S Albain; William E Barlow; Steven Shak; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Robert B Livingston; I-Tien Yeh; Peter Ravdin; Roberto Bugarini; Frederick L Baehner; Nancy E Davidson; George W Sledge; Eric P Winer; Clifford Hudis; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; Kathleen I Pritchard; Lois Shepherd; Julie R Gralow; Carl Yoshizawa; D Craig Allred; C Kent Osborne; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Lymphatic metastasis in breast cancer: importance and new insights into cellular and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Suzanne Eccles; Lenaic Paon; Jonathan Sleeman
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 5.150

9.  Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

10.  Low expression of a few genes indicates good prognosis in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Steven Buechler
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.