| Literature DB >> 18349391 |
Giuseppe Viale1, Meredith M Regan, Eugenio Maiorano, Mauro G Mastropasqua, Rastko Golouh, Tiziana Perin, Robert W Brown, Anikó Kovács, Komala Pillay, Christian Ohlschlegel, Stephen Braye, Piergiovanni Grigolato, Tiziana Rusca, Richard D Gelber, Monica Castiglione-Gertsch, Karen N Price, Aron Goldhirsch, Barry A Gusterson, Alan S Coates.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To centrally assess estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) levels by immunohistochemistry and investigate their predictive value for benefit of chemo-endocrine compared with endocrine adjuvant therapy alone in two randomized clinical trials for node-negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VIII compared cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy for 6 cycles followed by endocrine therapy with goserelin with either modality alone in pre- and perimenopausal patients. Trial IX compared three cycles of CMF followed by tamoxifen for 5 years versus tamoxifen alone in postmenopausal patients. Central Pathology Office reviewed 883 (83%) of 1,063 patients on Trial VIII and 1,365 (82%) of 1,669 on Trial IX and determined ER and PgR by immunohistochemistry. Disease-free survival (DFS) was compared across the spectrum of expression of each receptor using the Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot methodology.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18349391 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.6393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Oncol ISSN: 0732-183X Impact factor: 44.544