Literature DB >> 21276956

Redo aortic valve surgery: early and late outcomes.

Sergey Leontyev1, Michael A Borger, Piroze Davierwala, Thomas Walther, Sven Lehmann, Jörg Kempfert, Friedrich W Mohr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Repeat aortic valve surgery (rAVS) is usually associated with an increased risk profile due to advanced patient age and comorbidities. We analyzed the current early and late results for isolated rAVS.
METHODS: One hundred fifty-five patients underwent isolated rAVS from November 1994 to April 2008, of which, 86 received isolated redo aortic valve surgery (rAVS without root) and 69 received aortic root replacement (rAVS with root) as the second operation.
RESULTS: Patient age was 58 ± 16 years; 23% were female. The indications for redo surgery were infective endocarditis (27.1%, n = 42), bioprosthetic structural valve dysfunction and degeneration (23.8%, n = 37), mechanical valve nonstructural dysfunction (7.2%, n = 11), paravalvular leak (18.1%, n = 28), aortic dissection (2.6%, n = 4), and aortic aneurysm (7.1%, n = 11). Early mortality was 4.5% (n = 7) for all patients (3.5% for rAVS without root and 5.8% for rAVS with root, p = 0.5). Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.30 (odds ratio 9.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 80.3) and preoperative neurologic dysfunction (odds ratio 22.1, 95% CI 2.3 to 197.4) were found to be the independent predictors for in-hospital mortality according to multivariate analysis. Follow-up was 100% complete with a mean duration of 2.7 ± 2.8 years for all patients. Five-year and eight-year survival was 66% ± 5% and 61% ± 6% for all patients and did not significantly differ between surgical groups. Cox regression analysis revealed the following independent predictors of long-term survival: preoperative New York Heart Association functional class IV (hazard ratio 2.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.2, p < 0.01) and infective endocarditis (hazard ratio 2.2, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.1, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Repeat isolated aortic valve surgery is associated with respectable outcomes. Follow-up results reveal good long-term survival for this group.
Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21276956     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.12.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  17 in total

Review 1.  Redo proximal thoracic aortic surgery: challenges and controversies.

Authors:  Athanasios Antoniou; Mohamad Bashir; Amer Harky; Carmelo Di Salvo
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-05-18

Review 2.  Valve-in-valve implantations: is this the new standard for degenerated bioprostheses? Review of the literature.

Authors:  Krys Milburn; Vinayak Bapat; Martyn Thomas
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Tissue Valve Degeneration and Mechanical Valve Failure.

Authors:  Andrew C W Baldwin; George Tolis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-06-14

4.  Parsimonious assessment for reoperative aortic valve replacement; the deterrent effect of low left ventricular ejection fraction and renal impairment.

Authors:  Maroun Yammine; Fernando Ramirez-Del Val; Julius I Ejiofor; Robert C Neely; Diana Shi; Siobhan McGurk; Sary F Aranki; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Prem S Shekar
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

5.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: the Leipzig experience.

Authors:  Sven Lehmann; Denis R Merk; Christian D Etz; Joerg Seeburger; Thomas Schroeter; Andreas Oberbach; Madlen Uhlemann; Robert Hoellriegel; Martin Haensig; Sergey Leontyev; Jens Garbade; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

6.  Ross operation after failure of aortic valve repair.

Authors:  Karen B Abeln; Vincent Chauvette; Nancy Poirier; Shunsuke Matsushima; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Hans-Joachim Schäfers
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

7.  Comparison of Hemodynamics After Aortic Root Replacement Using Valve-Sparing or Bioprosthetic Valved Conduit.

Authors:  Jeremy D Collins; Edouard Semaan; Alex Barker; Patrick M McCarthy; James C Carr; Michael Markl; S Chris Malaisrie
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Redo aortic valve surgery versus transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failing surgical bioprosthetic valves: consecutive patients in a single-center setting.

Authors:  Magdalena Erlebach; Michael Wottke; Marcus-André Deutsch; Markus Krane; Nicolo Piazza; Ruediger Lange; Sabine Bleiziffer
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration.

Authors:  Ross M Reul; Mahesh K Ramchandani; Michael J Reardon
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

10.  Repeat aortic valve surgery: contemporary outcomes and risk stratification.

Authors:  Katrien François; Laurent De Backer; Thomas Martens; Tine Philipsen; Yves Van Belleghem; Thierry Bové
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.