Literature DB >> 29743998

Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration.

Ross M Reul1, Mahesh K Ramchandani1, Michael J Reardon1.   

Abstract

Surgical aortic valve replacement is the gold standard procedure to treat patients with severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis or insufficiency. Bioprosthetic valves are used for surgical aortic valve replacement with a much greater prevalence than mechanical valves. However, bioprosthetic valves may fail over time because of structural valve deterioration; this often requires intervention due to severe bioprosthetic valve stenosis or regurgitation or a combination of both. In select patients, transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement. Transcatheter valve-in-valve (ViV) replacement is performed by implanting a transcatheter heart valve within a failing bioprosthetic valve. The transcatheter ViV operation is a less invasive procedure compared with reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement, but it has been associated with specific complications and requires extensive preoperative work-up and planning by the heart team. Data from experimental studies and analyses of results from clinical procedures have led to strategies to improve outcomes of these procedures. The type, size, and implant position of the transcatheter valve can be optimized for individual patients with knowledge of detailed dimensions of the surgical valve and radiographic and echocardiographic measurements of the patient's anatomy. Understanding the complexities of the ViV procedure can lead surgeons to make choices during the original surgical valve implantation that can make a future ViV operation more technically feasible years before it is required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SAVR; TAVR; bioprosthetic valves; surgical aortic valve replacement; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; valve-in-valve repair

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29743998      PMCID: PMC5935197          DOI: 10.14797/mdcj-13-3-132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J        ISSN: 1947-6108


  72 in total

1.  Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation in degenerated bioprosthesis: the first valve in valve procedure using the Corevalve Revalving system.

Authors:  Peter Wenaweser; Lutz Buellesfeld; Ulrich Gerckens; Eberhard Grube
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Valve Type, Size, and Deployment Location Affect Hemodynamics in an In Vitro Valve-in-Valve Model.

Authors:  Prem A Midha; Vrishank Raghav; Jose F Condado; Ikechukwu U Okafor; Stamatios Lerakis; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis Babaliaros; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Effect of transcatheter aortic valve size and position on valve-in-valve hemodynamics: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ali N Azadani; Michael Reardon; Matheus Simonato; Gabriel Aldea; Georg Nickenig; Ran Kornowski; Danny Dvir
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic regurgitation in a stentless bioprosthetic valve with the Core Valve revalving system-technical tips and role of the Accutrak system.

Authors:  Kunal Sarkar; Gian Paolo Ussia; Corrado Tamburino
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation within a previous bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  James Cockburn; Uday Trivedi; David Hildick-Smith
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve therapies: patient selection, prosthesis assessment and selection, results, and future directions.

Authors:  Manuel Wilbring; Konstantin Alexiou; Sems-Malte Tugtekin; Bjoern Sill; Gregor Simonis; Klaus Matschke; Utz Kappert
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves.

Authors:  Danny Dvir; John G Webb; Sabine Bleiziffer; Miralem Pasic; Ron Waksman; Susheel Kodali; Marco Barbanti; Azeem Latib; Ulrich Schaefer; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Hendrik Treede; Nicolo Piazza; David Hildick-Smith; Dominique Himbert; Thomas Walther; Christian Hengstenberg; Henrik Nissen; Raffi Bekeredjian; Patrizia Presbitero; Enrico Ferrari; Amit Segev; Arend de Weger; Stephan Windecker; Neil E Moat; Massimo Napodano; Manuel Wilbring; Alfredo G Cerillo; Stephen Brecker; Didier Tchetche; Thierry Lefèvre; Federico De Marco; Claudia Fiorina; Anna Sonia Petronio; Rui C Teles; Luca Testa; Jean-Claude Laborde; Martin B Leon; Ran Kornowski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Redo aortic valve surgery versus transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failing surgical bioprosthetic valves: consecutive patients in a single-center setting.

Authors:  Magdalena Erlebach; Michael Wottke; Marcus-André Deutsch; Markus Krane; Nicolo Piazza; Ruediger Lange; Sabine Bleiziffer
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael J Mack; Raj R Makkar; Lars G Svensson; Susheel K Kodali; Vinod H Thourani; E Murat Tuzcu; D Craig Miller; Howard C Herrmann; Darshan Doshi; David J Cohen; Augusto D Pichard; Samir Kapadia; Todd Dewey; Vasilis Babaliaros; Wilson Y Szeto; Mathew R Williams; Dean Kereiakes; Alan Zajarias; Kevin L Greason; Brian K Whisenant; Robert W Hodson; Jeffrey W Moses; Alfredo Trento; David L Brown; William F Fearon; Philippe Pibarot; Rebecca T Hahn; Wael A Jaber; William N Anderson; Maria C Alu; John G Webb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  The role of echocardiography in the management of structural valve degeneration of transcatheter valves.

Authors:  Rahul Shabadi; Pushkar Desai; Nasser Al-Kemyani; Hatim Al-Lawati
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

2.  Hemodynamic outcomes after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-center experience.

Authors:  R Yazan Kherallah; Srikanth Koneru; Zvonimir Krajcer; Ourania Preventza; Kathryn G Dougherty; Melissa L McCormack; Briana T Costello; Stephanie Coulter; Neil E Strickman; Juan Carlos Plana Gomez; Ali Mortazavi; Jose G Díez; James J Livesay; Joseph S Coselli; Guilherme V Silva
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

Review 3.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Programs: Clinical Outcomes and Developments.

Authors:  Vinayak Kumar; Gurpreet S Sandhu; Charles M Harper; Henry H Ting; Charanjit S Rihal
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Noncalcific Mechanisms of Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Degeneration.

Authors:  Matteo Marro; Alexander P Kossar; Yingfei Xue; Antonio Frasca; Robert J Levy; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Bioprosthetic aortic valve diameter and thickness are directly related to leaflet fluttering: Results from a combined experimental and computational modeling study.

Authors:  Jae H Lee; Lawrence N Scotten; Robert Hunt; Thomas G Caranasos; John P Vavalle; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-09-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.