Literature DB >> 25694976

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: the Leipzig experience.

Sven Lehmann1, Denis R Merk1, Christian D Etz1, Joerg Seeburger1, Thomas Schroeter1, Andreas Oberbach1, Madlen Uhlemann1, Robert Hoellriegel1, Martin Haensig1, Sergey Leontyev1, Jens Garbade1, Martin Misfeld1, Friedrich W Mohr1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques are progressively challenging traditional approaches in cardiothoracic surgery. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) has become a routine procedure at our institution.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients undergoing minimally invasive isolated AVR between January 2003 and March 2014, at our institution. Mean follow-up was 4.7±4.3 years (range: 0-18 years) and was 99.8% complete.
RESULTS: There were 1,714 patients who received an isolated minimally invasive AVR. The mean (± SD) patient age was 65±12.8 years, ejection fraction 60%±12% and log EuroSCORE 5.3%±5.1%. Mean cross-clamp time was 58±18 minutes and mean cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was 82.9±26.7 minutes. Thirty-day survival was 97.8%±0.4%, and 69.4%±1.7% at 10-years. The multivariate analysis revealed age at surgery [P=0.016; odds ratio (OR), 1.1], length of surgery time (P=0.002; OR, 1.01), female gender (P=0.023; OR, 3.54), preoperative myocardial infarction (MI) (P=0.006; OR, 7.87), preoperative stroke (P=0.001; OR, 13.76) and preoperative liver failure (P=0.015; OR, 10.28) as independent risk factors for mortality. Cox-regression analysis revealed the following predictors for long term mortality: age over 75 years (P<0.001; OR, 3.5), preoperative dialysis (P<0.01; OR, 2.14), ejection fraction less than 30% (P=0.003; OR, 3.28) and urgent or emergency operation (P<0.001; OR, 2.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive AVR can be performed safely and effectively with very few perioperative complications. The early and long-term outcomes in these patients are acceptable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimal invasive; aortic valve replacement (AVR); long-term survival; short-term survival; surgical technique

Year:  2015        PMID: 25694976      PMCID: PMC4311153          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.11.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 2225-319X


  23 in total

1.  One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: early and late results.

Authors:  Tomislav Mihaljevic; Lawrence H Cohn; Daniel Unic; Sary F Aranki; Gregory S Couper; John G Byrne
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Aortic valve replacement: results and predictors of mortality from a contemporary series of 2256 patients.

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Daniela Fortuna; Rossana De Palma; Andrea Dell'Amore; Mauro Lamarra; Giovanni A Contini; Tiziano Gherli; Davide Gabbieri; Italo Ghidoni; Donald Cristell; Claudio Zussa; Florio Pigini; Peppino Pugliese; Davide Pacini; Roberto Di Bartolomeo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Prospective comparison between total sternotomy and ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Fadi Farhat; Zhiqian Lu; Mathilde Lefevre; Pietro Montagna; Philippe Mikaeloff; Olivier Jegaden
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.620

4.  Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations.

Authors:  D M Cosgrove; J F Sabik
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Minimal access aortic valve replacement: effects on morbidity and resource utilization.

Authors:  Nicolas Doll; Michael A Borger; Joerg Hain; Jan Bucerius; Thomas Walther; Jan F Gummert; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison.

Authors:  Denis R Merk; Sven Lehmann; David M Holzhey; Pascal Dohmen; Pascal Candolfi; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich W Mohr; Michael A Borger
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.

Authors:  Alfred A Kocher; Günther Laufer; Axel Haverich; Malakh Shrestha; Thomas Walther; Martin Misfeld; Joerg Kempfert; Linda Gillam; Christoph Schmitz; Thorsten C Wahlers; Jens Wippermann; Friedrich W Mohr; Matthias Roth; Adalbert Skwara; Parwis Rahmanian; Dominik Wiedemann; Michael A Borger
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Ten-year follow up after prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional xenograft aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Sven Lehmann; Thomas Walther; Jörg Kempfert; Sergey Leontyev; Farhad Bakhtiary; Ardawan Rastan; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2011-11

9.  Mid-term results after Epic xenograft implantation for aortic, mitral, and double valve replacement.

Authors:  Sven Lehmann; Thomas Walther; Sergey Leontjev; Jörg Kempfert; Ardawan Rastan; Jens Garbade; Michael A Borger; Volkmar Falk; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2007-11

10.  "J" incision minimal-access valve operations.

Authors:  L G Svensson; R S D'Agostino
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  2 in total

1.  Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery.

Authors:  Sebastiano Castrovinci; Sam Emmanuel; Marco Moscarelli; Giacomo Murana; Giuseppa Caccamo; Emanuela Clara Bertolino; Giuseppe Nasso; Giuseppe Speziale; Khalil Fattouch
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.327

2.  Mini-sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen C Hancock; Rebecca H Maier; Adetayo Kasim; James Mason; Gavin Murphy; Andrew Goodwin; W Andrew Owens; Enoch Akowuah
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.