OBJECTIVES: Redo aortic valve surgery (rAVS) is performed with increasing frequency, but operative mortality is usually higher compared to that associated with primary aortic valve surgery. We analysed our patients who had rAVS to determine the current outcomes of rAVS as a surgical benchmark in view of the growing interest in transcatheter valve techniques. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 148 consecutive patients [median age 67.7 years (interquartile range 54.9-77.6); 68.2% men] who underwent rAVS following aortic valve replacement (81.6%), aortic root replacement (15%) or aortic valve repair (3.4%) between 2000 and 2018. RESULTS: Indications for rAVS were structural valve dysfunction (42.7%), endocarditis (37.8%), non-structural valve dysfunction (17.7%) and aortic aneurysm (2.1%). Valve replacement was performed in 69.7%, and 34 new root procedures were necessary in 23%. Early mortality was 9.5% (n = 14). Female gender [odds ratio (OR) 6.16], coronary disease (OR 4.26) and lower creatinine clearance (OR 0.95) were independent predictors of early mortality. Follow-up was 98.6% complete [median 5.9 (interquartile range 1.7-10.9) years]. Survival was 74.1 ± 3.7%, 57.9 ± 5.1% and 43.8 ± 6.1% at 5, 10 and 14 years, respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed female gender [hazard ratio (HR) 1.73], diabetes (HR 1.73), coronary disease (HR 1.62) and peripheral vascular disease (HR 1.98) as independent determinants of late survival. CONCLUSIONS: Despite many urgent situations and advanced New York Heart Association functional class at presentation, rAVS could be performed with acceptable early and late outcomes. Risk factors for survival were female gender, coronary disease and urgency. In this all-comers patient cohort needing rAVS, only a minority would eventually qualify for transcatheter valve-in-valve procedures.
OBJECTIVES: Redo aortic valve surgery (rAVS) is performed with increasing frequency, but operative mortality is usually higher compared to that associated with primary aortic valve surgery. We analysed our patients who had rAVS to determine the current outcomes of rAVS as a surgical benchmark in view of the growing interest in transcatheter valve techniques. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 148 consecutive patients [median age 67.7 years (interquartile range 54.9-77.6); 68.2% men] who underwent rAVS following aortic valve replacement (81.6%), aortic root replacement (15%) or aortic valve repair (3.4%) between 2000 and 2018. RESULTS: Indications for rAVS were structural valve dysfunction (42.7%), endocarditis (37.8%), non-structural valve dysfunction (17.7%) and aortic aneurysm (2.1%). Valve replacement was performed in 69.7%, and 34 new root procedures were necessary in 23%. Early mortality was 9.5% (n = 14). Female gender [odds ratio (OR) 6.16], coronary disease (OR 4.26) and lower creatinine clearance (OR 0.95) were independent predictors of early mortality. Follow-up was 98.6% complete [median 5.9 (interquartile range 1.7-10.9) years]. Survival was 74.1 ± 3.7%, 57.9 ± 5.1% and 43.8 ± 6.1% at 5, 10 and 14 years, respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed female gender [hazard ratio (HR) 1.73], diabetes (HR 1.73), coronary disease (HR 1.62) and peripheral vascular disease (HR 1.98) as independent determinants of late survival. CONCLUSIONS: Despite many urgent situations and advanced New York Heart Association functional class at presentation, rAVS could be performed with acceptable early and late outcomes. Risk factors for survival were female gender, coronary disease and urgency. In this all-comers patient cohort needing rAVS, only a minority would eventually qualify for transcatheter valve-in-valve procedures.
Authors: Leora B Balsam; Eugene A Grossi; David G Greenhouse; Patricia Ursomanno; Abelardo Deanda; Greg H Ribakove; Alfred T Culliford; Aubrey C Galloway Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Peyman Naji; Brian P Griffin; Joseph F Sabik; Kenya Kusunose; Fadi Asfahan; Zoran B Popovic; L Leonardo Rodriguez; Bruce W Lytle; Richard A Grimm; Lars G Svensson; Milind Y Desai Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Christina M Vassileva; Brian Englum; Sunghee Kim; Maroun Yammine; Matthew Brennan; Rakesh M Suri; Vinod H Thourani; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Sary Aranki Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Miriam Silaschi; Olaf Wendler; Moritz Seiffert; Liesa Castro; Edith Lubos; Johannes Schirmer; Stefan Blankenberg; Hermann Reichenspurner; Ulrich Schäfer; Hendrik Treede; Philip MacCarthy; Lenard Conradi Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2016-09-13
Authors: Felix J Woitek; Georg Stachel; Philipp Kiefer; Stephan Haussig; Sergey Leontyev; Florian Schlotter; Meinhard Mende; Jennifer Hommel; Lisa Crusius; Aileen Spindler; Friedrich W Mohr; Gerhard Schuler; Holger Thiele; Michael A Borger; Axel Linke; David Holzhey; Norman Mangner Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Luis Garrido-Olivares; Manjula Maganti; Susan Armstrong; Tirone E David Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 5.209