Literature DB >> 31201568

Tissue Valve Degeneration and Mechanical Valve Failure.

Andrew C W Baldwin1, George Tolis2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The management of valvular heart disease has been dramatically influenced by recent evolutions in biomedical technology and surgical practice. With an aging population worldwide and accompanying increase in the prevalence of surgical valve disease, an understanding of prosthetic valve behavior and durability is essential for proper patient selection and management. This report offers an overview of the definitions, mechanisms, management, and clinical impact of structural valve degeneration and failure. RECENT
FINDINGS: Published literature has employed variable definitions and outcome measures, complicating our understanding of bioprosthetic valve behavior and function. The pathophysiology leading to structural valve degeneration is multifactorial and involves mechanical, hematologic, and immunologic elements. Technological advancements have resulted in improved valve performance and new strategies to mitigate the risks of degeneration. While mechanical valves have demonstrated negligible durability concerns, the benefits of bioprosthetic valves must be weighed against their potential for structural degeneration and subsequent reintervention. Valve selection should involve patient-specific deliberation, and guidelines have been established to help guide risk reduction strategies. Surgical valve replacement remains the standard of care for prosthetic valve failure, but emerging technology offers the potential to slow the development of structural degeneration and transcatheter valve-in-valve options are being increasingly explored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioprosthetic heart valves; Calcification; Mechanical heart valves; Valvular degeneration; Valvular heart disease

Year:  2019        PMID: 31201568     DOI: 10.1007/s11936-019-0735-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1092-8464


  39 in total

1.  Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial.

Authors:  K Hammermeister; G K Sethi; W G Henderson; F L Grover; C Oprian; S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management.

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Jean G Dumesnil
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions.

Authors:  Cary W Akins; D Craig Miller; Marko I Turina; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Eugene H Blackstone; Gary L Grunkemeier; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Tirone E David; Eric G Butchart; David H Adams; David M Shahian; Siegfried Hagl; John E Mayer; Bruce W Lytle
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Repeat heart valve surgery: risk factors for operative mortality.

Authors:  J M Jones; H O'kane; D J Gladstone; M A Sarsam; G Campalani; S W MacGowan; J Cleland; G W Cran
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Glutaraldehyde-fixed bioprosthetic heart valve conduits calcify and fail from xenograft rejection.

Authors:  Rizwan A Manji; Lin F Zhu; Nimrit K Nijjar; David C Rayner; Greg S Korbutt; Thomas A Churchill; Ray V Rajotte; Arvind Koshal; David B Ross
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study.

Authors:  Vuyisile T Nkomo; Julius M Gardin; Thomas N Skelton; John S Gottdiener; Christopher G Scott; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Tissue damage and calcification may be independent mechanisms of bioprosthetic heart valve failure.

Authors:  I Vesely; J E Barber; N B Ratliff
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2001-07

8.  A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors:  Bernard Iung; Gabriel Baron; Eric G Butchart; François Delahaye; Christa Gohlke-Bärwolf; Olaf W Levang; Pilar Tornos; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde; Frank Vermeer; Eric Boersma; Philippe Ravaud; Alec Vahanian
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Cardiovascular risk factors as predictors of early and late survival after bioprosthetic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Thierry Le Tourneau; Sylvestre Marechaux; André Vincentelli; Pierre Vladimir Ennezat; Thomas Modine; Anne-Sophie Polge; Georges Fayad; Alain Prat; Henri Warembourg; Ghislaine Deklunder
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2007-09

10.  Redo valvular surgery in elderly patients.

Authors:  Manjula Maganti; Vivek Rao; Susan Armstrong; Christopher M Feindel; Hugh E Scully; Tirone E David
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  3 in total

1.  Noncalcific Mechanisms of Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Degeneration.

Authors:  Matteo Marro; Alexander P Kossar; Yingfei Xue; Antonio Frasca; Robert J Levy; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.501

2.  Long-term durability of a new surgical aortic valve: A 1 billion cycle in vitro study.

Authors:  Vahid Sadri; Phillip M Trusty; Immanuel David Madukauwa-David; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-11-04

3.  Commentary: The ideal prosthetic valve: The quest for the Holy Grail continues.

Authors:  Alvise Guariento; Claudia Cattapan; Vladimiro Vida
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.