Literature DB >> 21271290

Net change in periosteal strain during stance shift loading after surgery correlates to rapid de novo bone generation in critically sized defects.

Sarah H McBride1, Scott Dolejs, Stefano Brianza, Ulf Knothe, Melissa L Knothe Tate.   

Abstract

In an ovine femur model, proliferative woven bone fills critically sized defects enveloped by periosteum within 2 weeks of treatment with the one-stage bone-transport surgery. We hypothesize that mechanical loading modulates this process. Using high-definition optical strain measurements we determined prevailing periosteal strains for normal and surgically treated ovine femora subjected ex vivo to compressive loads simulating in vivo stance shifting (n = 3 per group, normal vs. treated). We determined spatial distribution of calcein green, a label for bone apposition in first the 2 weeks after surgery, in 15°, 30°, and 45° sectors of histological cross sections through the middle of the defect zone (n = 6 bones, three to four sections per bone). Finally, we correlated early bone formation to either the maximal periosteal strain or the net change in maximal periosteal strain. We found that treatment with the one-stage bone-transport surgery profoundly changes the mechanical environment of cells within the periosteum during stance shift loading. The pattern of early bone formation is repeatable within and between animals and relates significantly to the actual strain magnitude prevailing in the periosteum during stance shift loading. Interestingly, early bone apposition after the surgery correlates well to the maximal net change in strain (above circa 2000-3000 με, in tension or compression) rather than strain magnitude per se, providing further evidence that changes in cell shape may drive mechanoadaptation by progenitor cells. These important insights regarding mechanobiological factors that enhance rapid bone generation in critically sized defects can be translated to the tissue and organ scale, providing a basis for the development of best practices for clinical implementation and the definition of movement protocols to enhance the regenerative effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21271290      PMCID: PMC3782390          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-0242-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  37 in total

Review 1.  Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment--implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery.

Authors:  Florian Rehfeldt; Adam J Engler; Adam Eckhardt; Fariyal Ahmed; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Design of tissue engineering scaffolds as delivery devices for mechanical and mechanically modulated signals.

Authors:  Eric J Anderson; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2007-10

3.  In vitro generated extracellular matrix and fluid shear stress synergistically enhance 3D osteoblastic differentiation.

Authors:  Néha Datta; Quynh P Pham; Upma Sharma; Vassilios I Sikavitsas; John A Jansen; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Biochemical signal transduction of mechanical strain in osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  D B Jones; H Nolte; J G Scholübbers; E Turner; D Veltel
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Periosteal progenitor cell fate in segmental cortical bone graft transplantations: implications for functional tissue engineering.

Authors:  Xinping Zhang; Chao Xie; Angela S P Lin; Hiromu Ito; Hani Awad; Jay R Lieberman; Paul T Rubery; Edward M Schwarz; Regis J O'Keefe; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Bone formation by revascularized periosteal and bone grafts, compared with traditional bone grafts.

Authors:  C L Puckett; J S Hurvitz; M H Metzler; D Silver
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Human femoral neck has less cellular periosteum, and more mineralized periosteum, than femoral diaphyseal bone.

Authors:  Matthew R Allen; David B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Comparison of human stem cells derived from various mesenchymal tissues: superiority of synovium as a cell source.

Authors:  Yusuke Sakaguchi; Ichiro Sekiya; Kazuyoshi Yagishita; Takeshi Muneta
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-08

9.  Matrix engineering for osteogenic differentiation of rabbit periosteal cells using alpha-tricalcium phosphate particles in a three-dimensional fibrin culture.

Authors:  Ron-Sascha Spitzer; Carsten Perka; Klaus Lindenhayn; Hartmut Zippel
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-03-15

10.  In situ spatiotemporal mapping of flow fields around seeded stem cells at the subcellular length scale.

Authors:  Min Jae Song; David Dean; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

1.  Anisotropic mechanical properties of ovine femoral periosteum and the effects of cryopreservation.

Authors:  Sarah H McBride; Sarah F Evans; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Current insights on the regenerative potential of the periosteum: molecular, cellular, and endogenous engineering approaches.

Authors:  Céline Colnot; Xinping Zhang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Effects of mechanical loading on cortical defect repair using a novel mechanobiological model of bone healing.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Robert Carrera; Vittoria Flamini; Lena Kenny; Pamela Cabahug-Zuckerman; Benson M George; Daniel Hunter; Bo Liu; Gurpreet Singh; Philipp Leucht; Kenneth A Mann; Jill A Helms; Alesha B Castillo
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Periosteal thickness and cellularity in mid-diaphyseal cross-sections from human femora and tibiae of aged donors.

Authors:  Shannon R Moore; Stefan Milz; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  Periosteum mechanobiology and mechanistic insights for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Melissa L Knothe Tate; Nicole Y C Yu; Iman Jalilian; André F Pereira; Ulf R Knothe
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-11-30

Review 6.  Elucidating multiscale periosteal mechanobiology: a key to unlocking the smart properties and regenerative capacity of the periosteum?

Authors:  Sarah F Evans; Hana Chang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 7.  Concise review: the periosteum: tapping into a reservoir of clinically useful progenitor cells.

Authors:  Hana Chang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.940

8.  Translating Periosteum's Regenerative Power: Insights From Quantitative Analysis of Tissue Genesis With a Periosteum Substitute Implant.

Authors:  Shannon R Moore; Céline Heu; Nicole Y C Yu; Renee M Whan; Ulf R Knothe; Stefan Milz; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 6.940

9.  Bone vs. fat: embryonic origin of progenitors determines response to androgen in adipocytes and osteoblasts.

Authors:  Kristine M Wiren; Joel G Hashimoto; Anthony A Semirale; Xiao-Wei Zhang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Major and minor centroidal axes serve as objective, automatable reference points to test mechanobiological hypotheses using histomorphometry.

Authors:  Sarah H McBride; Scott Dolejs; Ulf Knothe; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.