Literature DB >> 22778049

Current insights on the regenerative potential of the periosteum: molecular, cellular, and endogenous engineering approaches.

Céline Colnot1, Xinping Zhang, Melissa L Knothe Tate.   

Abstract

While century old clinical reports document the periosteum's remarkable regenerative capacity, only in the past decade have scientists undertaken mechanistic investigations of its regenerative potential. At a Workshop at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Orthopaedic Research Society, we reviewed the molecular, cellular, and tissue scale approaches to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the periosteum's regenerative potential as well as translational therapies engineering solutions inspired by its remarkable regenerative capacity. The entire population of osteoblasts within periosteum, and at endosteal and trabecular bone surfaces within the bone marrow, derives from the embryonic perichondrium. Periosteal cells contribute more to cartilage and bone formation within the callus during fracture healing than do cells of the bone marrow or endosteum, which do not migrate out of the marrow compartment. Furthermore, a current healing paradigm regards the activation, expansion, and differentiation of periosteal stem/progenitor cells as an essential step in building a template for subsequent neovascularization, bone formation, and remodeling. The periosteum comprises a complex, composite structure, providing a niche for pluripotent cells and a repository for molecular factors that modulate cell behavior. The periosteum's advanced, "smart" material properties change depending on the mechanical, chemical, and biological state of the tissue. Understanding periosteum development, progenitor cell-driven initiation of periosteum's endogenous tissue building capacity, and the complex structure-function relationships of periosteum as an advanced material are important for harnessing and engineering ersatz materials to mimic the periosteum's remarkable regenerative capacity.
Copyright © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22778049      PMCID: PMC4620732          DOI: 10.1002/jor.22181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  92 in total

1.  Osteal macrophages promote in vivo intramembranous bone healing in a mouse tibial injury model.

Authors:  Kylie A Alexander; Ming K Chang; Erin R Maylin; Thomas Kohler; Ralph Müller; Andy C Wu; Nico Van Rooijen; Matthew J Sweet; David A Hume; Liza J Raggatt; Allison R Pettit
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Harnessing the parathyroid hormone, Wnt, and bone morphogenetic protein signaling cascades for successful bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Vicki Rosen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Endogenous bone marrow MSCs are dynamic, fate-restricted participants in bone maintenance and regeneration.

Authors:  Dongsu Park; Joel A Spencer; Bong Ihn Koh; Tatsuya Kobayashi; Joji Fujisaki; Thomas L Clemens; Charles P Lin; Henry M Kronenberg; David T Scadden
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 24.633

4.  Does adult fracture repair recapitulate embryonic skeletal formation?

Authors:  C Ferguson; E Alpern; T Miclau; J A Helms
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.882

5.  Human femoral neck has less cellular periosteum, and more mineralized periosteum, than femoral diaphyseal bone.

Authors:  Matthew R Allen; David B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Bone morphogenetic protein 2 induces cyclo-oxygenase 2 in osteoblasts via a Cbfal binding site: role in effects of bone morphogenetic protein 2 in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Daichi Chikazu; Xiaodong Li; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Yoko Sakuma; Olga S Voznesensky; Douglas J Adams; Manshan Xu; Kazuto Hoshio; Vedran Katavic; Harvey R Herschman; Lawrence G Raisz; Carol C Pilbeam
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Circulating cells with osteogenic potential are physiologically mobilized into the fracture healing site in the parabiotic mice model.

Authors:  Ken Kumagai; Amit Vasanji; Judith A Drazba; Robert S Butler; George F Muschler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Donor cell-derived osteopoiesis originates from a self-renewing stem cell with a limited regenerative contribution after transplantation.

Authors:  Massimo Dominici; Roberta Marino; Valeria Rasini; Carlotta Spano; Paolo Paolucci; Pierfranco Conte; Ted J Hofmann; Edwin M Horwitz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Beta-catenin signaling plays a disparate role in different phases of fracture repair: implications for therapy to improve bone healing.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Heather C Whetstone; Alvin C Lin; Puviindran Nadesan; Qingxia Wei; Raymond Poon; Benjamin A Alman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  A I Caplan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  83 in total

Review 1.  Skeletal Blood Flow in Bone Repair and Maintenance.

Authors:  Ryan E Tomlinson; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 2.  Overview of biological mechanisms and applications of three murine models of bone repair: closed fracture with intramedullary fixation, distraction osteogenesis, and marrow ablation by reaming.

Authors:  Beth Bragdon; Kyle Lybrand; Louis Gerstenfeld
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mouse Biol       Date:  2015-03-02

Review 3.  Periosteum: biology and applications in craniofacial bone regeneration.

Authors:  Z Lin; A Fateh; D M Salem; G Intini
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  Biological perspectives of delayed fracture healing.

Authors:  K D Hankenson; G Zimmerman; R Marcucio
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Periosteal thickness and cellularity in mid-diaphyseal cross-sections from human femora and tibiae of aged donors.

Authors:  Shannon R Moore; Stefan Milz; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  Dynamic interplay between bone and multiple myeloma: emerging roles of the osteoblast.

Authors:  Michaela R Reagan; Lucy Liaw; Clifford J Rosen; Irene M Ghobrial
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 7.  Periosteum mechanobiology and mechanistic insights for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Melissa L Knothe Tate; Nicole Y C Yu; Iman Jalilian; André F Pereira; Ulf R Knothe
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-11-30

Review 8.  Cellular therapy in bone-tendon interface regeneration.

Authors:  Benjamin B Rothrauff; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 9.  Tendon stem progenitor cells: Understanding the biology to inform therapeutic strategies for tendon repair.

Authors:  Bhavita Walia; Alice H Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Layer-by-layer nanofiber-enabled engineering of biomimetic periosteum for bone repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Yuankun Zhai; Marc Nuzzo; Xiaochuan Yang; Yunpeng Yang; Xinping Zhang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.