Literature DB >> 24175932

Periosteal thickness and cellularity in mid-diaphyseal cross-sections from human femora and tibiae of aged donors.

Shannon R Moore1, Stefan Milz, Melissa L Knothe Tate.   

Abstract

Due to lack of access in healthy patients, the structural properties underlying the inherent regenerative power and advanced material properties of the human periosteum are not well understood. Periosteum comprises a cellular cambium layer directly apposing the outer surface of bone and an outer fibrous layer encompassed by the surrounding soft tissues. As a first step to elucidating the structural and cellular characteristics of periosteum in human bone, the current study aims to measure cambium and fibrous layer thickness as well as cambium cellularity in human femora and tibiae of aged donors. The major and minor centroidal axes (CA) serve as automated reference points in cross-sections of cadaveric mid-diaphyseal femora and tibiae. Based on the results of this study, within a given individual, the cambium layer of the major CA of the tibia is significantly thicker and more cellular than the respective layer of the femur. These significant intraindividual differences do not translate to significant interindividual differences. Further, mid-diaphyseal periosteal measures including cambium and fibrous layer thickness and cellularity do not correlate significantly with age or body mass. Finally, qualitative observations of periosteum in amputated and contralateral or proximal long bones of the lower extremity show stark changes in layer organization, thickness, and cellularity. In a translational context, these novel data, though inherently limited by availability and accessibility of human mid-diaphyseal periosteum tissue, provide important reference values for the use of periosteum in the context of facilitated healing and regeneration of tissue.
© 2013 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amputee; loading history; mechanobiology; periosteal cells; periosteum

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24175932      PMCID: PMC3969058          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  27 in total

1.  Anisotropic mechanical properties of ovine femoral periosteum and the effects of cryopreservation.

Authors:  Sarah H McBride; Sarah F Evans; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Biochemical signal transduction of mechanical strain in osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  D B Jones; H Nolte; J G Scholübbers; E Turner; D Veltel
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  The mechanobiological effects of periosteal surface loads.

Authors:  R Dana Carpenter; Dennis R Carter
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2007-05-09

4.  Mechanics of avian fibrous periosteum: tensile and adhesion properties during growth.

Authors:  J E Bertram; Y Polevoy; D M Cullinane
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  A histological evaluation for guided bone regeneration induced by a collagenous membrane.

Authors:  Yuya Taguchi; Norio Amizuka; Masayoshi Nakadate; Hideo Ohnishi; Noritaka Fujii; Kimimitsu Oda; Shuichi Nomura; Takeyasu Maeda
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Major and minor centroidal axes serve as objective, automatable reference points to test mechanobiological hypotheses using histomorphometry.

Authors:  Sarah H McBride; Scott Dolejs; Ulf Knothe; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Tensile mechanical strain up-regulates Runx2 and osteogenic factor expression in human periosteal cells: implications for distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Takahiro Kanno; Tetsu Takahashi; Wataru Ariyoshi; Toshiyuki Tsujisawa; Megumi Haga; Tatsuji Nishihara
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Periosteum responds to dynamic fluid pressure by proliferating in vitro.

Authors:  D B Saris; A Sanyal; K N An; J S Fitzsimmons; S W O'Driscoll
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Structural and cellular differences between metaphyseal and diaphyseal periosteum in different aged rats.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Ross Crawford; Yin Xiao
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Remodeling of actin cytoskeleton in mouse periosteal cells under mechanical loading induces periosteal cell proliferation during bone formation.

Authors:  Daisuke Sakai; Isao Kii; Kazuki Nakagawa; Hiroko N Matsumoto; Masateru Takahashi; Suguru Yoshida; Takamitsu Hosoya; Kazuo Takakuda; Akira Kudo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Periosteum mechanobiology and mechanistic insights for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Melissa L Knothe Tate; Nicole Y C Yu; Iman Jalilian; André F Pereira; Ulf R Knothe
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-11-30

2.  Translating Periosteum's Regenerative Power: Insights From Quantitative Analysis of Tissue Genesis With a Periosteum Substitute Implant.

Authors:  Shannon R Moore; Céline Heu; Nicole Y C Yu; Renee M Whan; Ulf R Knothe; Stefan Milz; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 6.940

3.  Human Periosteal Derived Stem Cell Potential: The Impact of age.

Authors:  Concetta Ferretti; Guendalina Lucarini; Chiara Andreoni; Eleonora Salvolini; Novella Bianchi; Giovanni Vozzi; Antonio Gigante; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 4.  UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du; Christine B Chung
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  The macroscopic and histomorphological properties of periosteal rib lesions and its relation with disease duration: evidence from the Luis Lopes Skeletal Collection (Lisbon, Portugal).

Authors:  Sandra Assis; Anne Keenleyside
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  NIR fluorescence for monitoring in vivo scaffold degradation along with stem cell tracking in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Soon Hee Kim; Ji Hoon Park; Jin Seon Kwon; Jae Gu Cho; Kate G Park; Chan Hum Park; James J Yoo; Anthony Atala; Hak Soo Choi; Moon Suk Kim; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Microneedle patch for the ultrasensitive quantification of protein biomarkers in interstitial fluid.

Authors:  Zheyu Wang; Jingyi Luan; Anushree Seth; Lin Liu; Minli You; Prashant Gupta; Priya Rathi; Yixuan Wang; Sisi Cao; Qisheng Jiang; Xiao Zhang; Rohit Gupta; Qingjun Zhou; Jeremiah J Morrissey; Erica L Scheller; Jai S Rudra; Srikanth Singamaneni
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 25.671

8.  Myoconductive and osteoinductive free-standing polysaccharide membranes.

Authors:  Sofia G Caridade; Claire Monge; Jorge Almodóvar; Raphael Guillot; Jonathan Lavaud; Véronique Josserand; Jean-Luc Coll; João F Mano; Catherine Picart
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Associations Between Periosteal Reaction of Proximal Tibial and Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Xiang-Tian Deng; Hong-Zhi Hu; Jian Zhu; Wei Chen; Zhong-Zheng Wang; Yu-Chuan Wang; Zhi-Peng Ye; Sif-An Yang; Ying-Ze Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 10.  Bone regeneration strategies: Engineered scaffolds, bioactive molecules and stem cells current stage and future perspectives.

Authors:  Antalya Ho-Shui-Ling; Johanna Bolander; Laurence E Rustom; Amy Wagoner Johnson; Frank P Luyten; Catherine Picart
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.