Literature DB >> 21632057

Anisotropic mechanical properties of ovine femoral periosteum and the effects of cryopreservation.

Sarah H McBride1, Sarah F Evans, Melissa L Knothe Tate.   

Abstract

The mechanical properties of periosteum are not well characterized. An understanding of these properties is critical to predict the environment of pluripotent and osteochondroprogenitor cells that reside within the periosteum and that have been shown recently to exhibit a remarkably rapid capacity to generate bone de novo. Furthermore, the effects of cryopreservation on periosteal mechanical properties are currently unknown. We hypothesized that the periosteum is pre-stressed in situ and that the periosteum exhibits anisotropic material properties, e.g. the elastic modulus of the periosteum depends significantly on the direction of loading. We measured the change in area, axial length, and circumferential length of anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral fresh periosteal samples removed from underlying bone (t=0-16 h) as well as the average strain in axially and circumferentially oriented anterior periosteal samples subjected to tensile strain (0.004 mm/s) until failure. The elastic modulus was calculated from the resulting stress-strain curves. Tensile testing was repeated with axially aligned samples that had been slowly cryopreserved for comparison to fresh samples. Periosteal samples from all aspects shrank 44-54%, 33-47%, and 9-19% in area, axial length, and circumferential length, respectively. At any given time, the periosteum shrank significantly more in the axial direction than the circumferential direction. Tensile testing showed that the periosteum is highly anisotropic. When loaded axially, a compliant toe region of the stress-strain curve (1.93±0.14 MPa) is followed by a stiffer region until failure (25.67±6.87 MPa). When loaded circumferentially, no toe region is observable and the periosteum remained compliant until failure (4.41±1.21 MPa). Cryopreservation had no significant effect on the elastic modulus of the periosteum. As the periosteum serves as the bounding envelope of the femur, anisotropy in periosteal properties may play a key role in modulating bone growth, healing and adaptation, in health, disease, and trauma.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21632057      PMCID: PMC3742367          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  25 in total

1.  Testing of a new one-stage bone-transport surgical procedure exploiting the periosteum for the repair of long-bone defects.

Authors:  Melissa L Knothe Tate; Todd F Ritzman; Erich Schneider; Ulf R Knothe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Biochemical signal transduction of mechanical strain in osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  D B Jones; H Nolte; J G Scholübbers; E Turner; D Veltel
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Mechanics of avian fibrous periosteum: tensile and adhesion properties during growth.

Authors:  J E Bertram; Y Polevoy; D M Cullinane
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Measurement of mechanical characteristics of tibial periosteum and evaluation of local differences.

Authors:  E Uchiyama; K Yamakoshi; T Sasaki
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Effects of mechanical loading patterns, bone graft, and proximity to periosteum on bone defect healing.

Authors:  Ulf R Knothe; Scott Dolejs; R Matthew Miller; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The effect of cryopreservation on canine menisci: a biochemical, morphologic, and biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  S P Arnoczky; C A McDevitt; M B Schmidt; V C Mow; R F Warren
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  A method for obtaining repeatable measurements of the tensile properties of skin at low strain.

Authors:  J M Mansour; B R Davis; M Srour; R Theberge
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  In vivo strain measurements from bone and prosthesis following total hip replacement. An experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  L E Lanyon; I L Paul; C T Rubin; E L Thrasher; R DeLaura; R M Rose; E L Radin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Tensile mechanical strain up-regulates Runx2 and osteogenic factor expression in human periosteal cells: implications for distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Takahiro Kanno; Tetsu Takahashi; Wataru Ariyoshi; Toshiyuki Tsujisawa; Megumi Haga; Tatsuji Nishihara
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Human femoral neck has less cellular periosteum, and more mineralized periosteum, than femoral diaphyseal bone.

Authors:  Matthew R Allen; David B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Current insights on the regenerative potential of the periosteum: molecular, cellular, and endogenous engineering approaches.

Authors:  Céline Colnot; Xinping Zhang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Periosteal thickness and cellularity in mid-diaphyseal cross-sections from human femora and tibiae of aged donors.

Authors:  Shannon R Moore; Stefan Milz; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Periosteum mechanobiology and mechanistic insights for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Melissa L Knothe Tate; Nicole Y C Yu; Iman Jalilian; André F Pereira; Ulf R Knothe
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-11-30

Review 4.  Elucidating multiscale periosteal mechanobiology: a key to unlocking the smart properties and regenerative capacity of the periosteum?

Authors:  Sarah F Evans; Hana Chang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 5.  Concise review: the periosteum: tapping into a reservoir of clinically useful progenitor cells.

Authors:  Hana Chang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.940

6.  Influence of partial meniscectomy on attachment forces, superficial strain and contact mechanics in porcine knee joints.

Authors:  Maren Freutel; Andreas M Seitz; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Translating Periosteum's Regenerative Power: Insights From Quantitative Analysis of Tissue Genesis With a Periosteum Substitute Implant.

Authors:  Shannon R Moore; Céline Heu; Nicole Y C Yu; Renee M Whan; Ulf R Knothe; Stefan Milz; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 6.940

8.  Masquelet technique: The effect of altering implant material and topography on membrane matrix composition, mechanical and barrier properties in a rat defect model.

Authors:  Natalie Gaio; Alice Martino; Zacharie Toth; J Tracy Watson; Daemeon Nicolaou; Sarah McBride-Gagyi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Human Periosteal Derived Stem Cell Potential: The Impact of age.

Authors:  Concetta Ferretti; Guendalina Lucarini; Chiara Andreoni; Eleonora Salvolini; Novella Bianchi; Giovanni Vozzi; Antonio Gigante; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.739

10.  Arthritic periosteal tissue from joint replacement surgery: a novel, autologous source of stem cells.

Authors:  Hana Chang; Denitsa Docheva; Ulf R Knothe; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.940

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.