Literature DB >> 16294266

Periosteal progenitor cell fate in segmental cortical bone graft transplantations: implications for functional tissue engineering.

Xinping Zhang1, Chao Xie, Angela S P Lin, Hiromu Ito, Hani Awad, Jay R Lieberman, Paul T Rubery, Edward M Schwarz, Regis J O'Keefe, Robert E Guldberg.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A murine segmental femoral bone graft model was used to show the essential role of donor periosteal progenitor cells in bone graft healing. Transplantation of live bone graft harvested from Rosa 26A mice showed that approximately 70% of osteogenesis on the graft was attributed to the expansion and differentiation of donor periosteal progenitor cells. Furthermore, engraftment of BMP-2-producing bone marrow stromal cells on nonvital allografts showed marked increases in cortical graft incorporation and neovascularization, suggesting that gene-enhanced, tissue engineered functional periosteum may improve allograft incorporation and repair.
INTRODUCTION: The loss of cellular activity in a structural bone allograft markedly reduces its healing potential compared with a live autograft. To further understand the cellular mechanisms for structural bone graft healing and repair and to devise a therapeutic strategy aimed at enhancing the performance of allograft, we established a segmental femoral structural bone graft model in mice that permits qualitative and quantitative analyses of graft healing and neovascularization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using this segmental femoral bone graft model, we transplanted live isografts harvested from Rosa 26A mice that constitutively express beta-galactosidase into their wildtype control mice. In an attempt to emulate the osteogenic and angiogenic properties of periosteum, we applied a cell-based, adenovirus-mediated gene therapy approach to engraft BMP-2-producing bone marrow stromal cells onto devitalized allografts.
RESULTS: X-gal staining for donor cells allowed monitoring the progression of periosteal progenitor cell fate and showed that 70% of osteogenesis was attributed to cellular proliferation and differentiation of donor progenitor cells on the surface of the live bone graft. Quantitative muCT analyses showed a 3-fold increase in new bone callus formation and a 6.8-fold increase in neovascularization for BMP-2/stromal cell-treated allograft compared with control acellular allografts. Histologic analyses showed the key features of autograft healing in the BMP-2/stromal cell-treated allografts, including the formation of a mineralized bone callus completely bridging the segmental defects, abundant neovascularization, and extensive resorption of bone graft.
CONCLUSIONS: The marked improvement of healing in these cellularized allografts suggests a clinical strategy for engineering a functional periosteum to improve the osteogenic and angiogenic properties of processed allografts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16294266      PMCID: PMC4527562          DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.050806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  44 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of retrieved massive allografts: preliminary results.

Authors:  D L Wheeler; J L Haynie; H Berrey; M Scarborough; W Enneking
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Analyzing bone, blood vessels, and biomaterials with microcomputed tomography.

Authors:  R E Guldberg; R T Ballock; B D Boyan; C L Duvall; A S Lin; S Nagaraja; M Oest; J Phillips; B D Porter; G Robertson; W R Taylor
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Normal and heterotopic periosteum.

Authors:  K H Włodarski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Disruption of overlapping transcripts in the ROSA beta geo 26 gene trap strain leads to widespread expression of beta-galactosidase in mouse embryos and hematopoietic cells.

Authors:  B P Zambrowicz; A Imamoto; S Fiering; L A Herzenberg; W G Kerr; P Soriano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Biology of bone transplantation.

Authors:  H Burchardt
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Use of revascularized periosteal allografts for repairing bony defects: an experimental study.

Authors:  J Y Liu; D Wang; H H Cheng
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.425

7.  The biology of bone graft repair.

Authors:  H Burchardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Does adult fracture repair recapitulate embryonic skeletal formation?

Authors:  C Ferguson; E Alpern; T Miclau; J A Helms
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.882

9.  Retrieved human allografts : a clinicopathological study.

Authors:  W F Enneking; D A Campanacci
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Effect of regional gene therapy with bone morphogenetic protein-2-producing bone marrow cells on spinal fusion in rats.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Wang; Linda E A Kanim; Stephen Yoo; Patricia A Campbell; Arnold J Berk; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  117 in total

1.  Net change in periosteal strain during stance shift loading after surgery correlates to rapid de novo bone generation in critically sized defects.

Authors:  Sarah H McBride; Scott Dolejs; Stefano Brianza; Ulf Knothe; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Bone grafts in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Mohammed E Elsalanty; David G Genecov
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-10

3.  Colonization and osteogenic differentiation of different stem cell sources on electrospun nanofiber meshes.

Authors:  Yash M Kolambkar; Alexandra Peister; Andrew K Ekaputra; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Delayed short-course treatment with teriparatide (PTH(1-34)) improves femoral allograft healing by enhancing intramembranous bone formation at the graft-host junction.

Authors:  Masahiko Takahata; Edward M Schwarz; Tony Chen; Regis J O'Keefe; Hani A Awad
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Current insights on the regenerative potential of the periosteum: molecular, cellular, and endogenous engineering approaches.

Authors:  Céline Colnot; Xinping Zhang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Partial characterization of the Sox2+ cell population in an adult murine model of digit amputation.

Authors:  Vineet Agrawal; Bernard F Siu; Hsu Chao; Karen K Hirschi; Eric Raborn; Scott A Johnson; Stephen Tottey; Katherine B Hurley; Chris J Medberry; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Cellular and molecular factors in flexor tendon repair and adhesions: a histological and gene expression analysis.

Authors:  Subhash C Juneja; Edward M Schwarz; Regis J O'Keefe; Hani A Awad
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.417

8.  Electrospun fibers as a scaffolding platform for bone tissue repair.

Authors:  Seungyoun Lyu; Chunlan Huang; Hong Yang; Xinping Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Molecular imaging of expression of vascular endothelial growth factor a (VEGF a) in femoral bone grafts transplanted into living mice.

Authors:  Olga Strachna; Daniel Torrecilla; Marie K Reumann; Inna Serganova; Jihye Kim; Simone Gieschler; Adele L Boskey; Ronald G Blasberg; Philipp Mayer-Kuckuk
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Layer-by-layer nanofiber-enabled engineering of biomimetic periosteum for bone repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Yuankun Zhai; Marc Nuzzo; Xiaochuan Yang; Yunpeng Yang; Xinping Zhang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.