Literature DB >> 29305998

Effects of mechanical loading on cortical defect repair using a novel mechanobiological model of bone healing.

Chao Liu1, Robert Carrera2, Vittoria Flamini3, Lena Kenny4, Pamela Cabahug-Zuckerman1, Benson M George5, Daniel Hunter5, Bo Liu5, Gurpreet Singh5, Philipp Leucht6, Kenneth A Mann7, Jill A Helms5, Alesha B Castillo8.   

Abstract

Mechanical loading is an important aspect of post-surgical fracture care. The timing of load application relative to the injury event may differentially regulate repair depending on the stage of healing. Here, we used a novel mechanobiological model of cortical defect repair that offers several advantages including its technical simplicity and spatially confined repair program, making effects of both physical and biological interventions more easily assessed. Using this model, we showed that daily loading (5N peak load, 2Hz, 60 cycles, 4 consecutive days) during hematoma consolidation and inflammation disrupted the injury site and activated cartilage formation on the periosteal surface adjacent to the defect. We also showed that daily loading during the matrix deposition phase enhanced both bone and cartilage formation at the defect site, while loading during the remodeling phase resulted in an enlarged woven bone regenerate. All loading regimens resulted in abundant cellular proliferation throughout the regenerate and fibrous tissue formation directly above the defect demonstrating that all phases of cortical defect healing are sensitive to physical stimulation. Stress was concentrated at the edges of the defect during exogenous loading, and finite element (FE)-modeled longitudinal strain (εzz) values along the anterior and posterior borders of the defect (~2200με) was an order of magnitude larger than strain values on the proximal and distal borders (~50-100με). It is concluded that loading during the early stages of repair may impede stabilization of the injury site important for early bone matrix deposition, whereas loading while matrix deposition and remodeling are ongoing may enhance stabilization through the formation of additional cartilage and bone. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone repair; Cortical defect; Mechanical loading; Mechanobiology; Mouse tibia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29305998      PMCID: PMC8262576          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  42 in total

1.  Influence of the fixation stability on the healing time--a numerical study of a patient-specific fracture healing process.

Authors:  Tim Wehner; Lutz Claes; Frank Niemeyer; Daniel Nolte; Ulrich Simon
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Effect of mechanical stimuli on skeletal regeneration around implants.

Authors:  Philipp Leucht; Jae-Beom Kim; Rima Wazen; Jennifer A Currey; Antonio Nanci; John B Brunski; Jill A Helms
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration.

Authors:  D R Carter; G S Beaupré; N J Giori; J A Helms
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A comparison of mechanical properties derived from multiple skeletal sites in mice.

Authors:  Jennifer L Schriefer; Alexander G Robling; Stuart J Warden; Adam J Fournier; James J Mason; Charles H Turner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Non-invasive axial loading of mouse tibiae increases cortical bone formation and modifies trabecular organization: a new model to study cortical and cancellous compartments in a single loaded element.

Authors:  Roberto L De Souza; Maiko Matsuura; Felix Eckstein; Simon C F Rawlinson; Lance E Lanyon; Andrew A Pitsillides
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Immediate weight-bearing after treatment of a comminuted fracture of the femoral shaft with a statically locked intramedullary nail.

Authors:  R J Brumback; T R Toal; M S Murphy-Zane; V P Novak; S M Belkoff
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Bone regeneration is regulated by wnt signaling.

Authors:  Jae-Beom Kim; Philipp Leucht; Kentson Lam; Cynthia Luppen; Derk Ten Berge; Roel Nusse; Jill A Helms
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing.

Authors:  D R Carter; P R Blenman; G S Beaupré
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Strain rate and timing of stimulation in mechanical modulation of fracture healing.

Authors:  A E Goodship; J L Cunningham; J Kenwright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Differential fracture healing resulting from fixation stiffness variability: a mouse model.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Sara M Putnam; Ambrose Wong; Philipp N Streubel; Akhilesh Kotiya; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 1.805

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Mechanical Loading Promotes the Expansion of Primitive Osteoprogenitors and Organizes Matrix and Vascular Morphology in Long Bone Defects.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Pamela Cabahug-Zuckerman; Christopher Stubbs; Martin Pendola; Cinyee Cai; Kenneth A Mann; Alesha B Castillo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Bone fracture healing: perspectives according to molecular basis.

Authors:  Iván Nadir Camal Ruggieri; Andrés Mauricio Cícero; Joao Paulo Mardegan Issa; Sara Feldman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  VEGFA From Early Osteoblast Lineage Cells (Osterix+) Is Required in Mice for Fracture Healing.

Authors:  Evan G Buettmann; Jennifer A McKenzie; Nicole Migotsky; David Aw Sykes; Pei Hu; Susumu Yoneda; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Strain Distribution Evaluation of Rat Tibia under Axial Compressive Load by Combining Strain Gauge Measurement and Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Jiazi Gao; Bei Liu; Min Zhang; He Gong; Bingzhao Gao
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 1.781

6.  Real-time finite element analysis allows homogenization of tissue scale strains and reduces variance in a mouse defect healing model.

Authors:  Graeme R Paul; Esther Wehrle; Duncan C Tourolle; Gisela A Kuhn; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Bone morphogenetic protein 2-induced cellular chemotaxis drives tissue patterning during critical-sized bone defect healing: an in silico study.

Authors:  Edoardo Borgiani; Georg N Duda; Bettina M Willie; Sara Checa
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-05-28

Review 8.  Recent Progress in Space Physiology and Aging.

Authors:  Felice Strollo; Sandro Gentile; Giovanna Strollo; Andrea Mambro; Joan Vernikos
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Site-Specific Load-Induced Expansion of Sca-1+Prrx1+ and Sca-1-Prrx1+ Cells in Adult Mouse Long Bone Is Attenuated With Age.

Authors:  Pamela Cabahug-Zuckerman; Chao Liu; Cinyee Cai; Ian Mahaffey; Stephanie C Norman; Whitney Cole; Alesha B Castillo
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2019-07-30

Review 10.  An overview of de novo bone generation in animal models.

Authors:  Takashi Taguchi; Mandi J Lopez
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.