Literature DB >> 21270639

Patient reactions to personalized medicine vignettes: an experimental design.

Morgan Butrick1, Debra Roter, Kimberly Kaphingst, Lori H Erby, Carlton Haywood, Mary Catherine Beach, Howard P Levy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Translational investigation on personalized medicine is in its infancy. Exploratory studies reveal attitudinal barriers to "race-based medicine" and cautious optimism regarding genetically personalized medicine. This study describes patient responses to hypothetical conventional, race-based, or genetically personalized medicine prescriptions.
METHODS: Three hundred eighty-seven participants (mean age = 47 years; 46% white) recruited from a Baltimore outpatient center were randomized to this vignette-based experimental study. They were asked to imagine a doctor diagnosing a condition and prescribing them one of three medications. The outcomes are emotional response to vignette, belief in vignette medication efficacy, experience of respect, trust in the vignette physician, and adherence intention.
RESULTS: Race-based medicine vignettes were appraised more negatively than conventional vignettes across the board (Cohen's d = -0.51-0.57-0.64, P < 0.001). Participants rated genetically personalized comparably with conventional medicine (-0.14-0.15-0.17, P = 0.47), with the exception of reduced adherence intention to genetically personalized medicine (Cohen's d = -0.38-0.41-0.44, P = 0.009). This relative reluctance to take genetically personalized medicine was pronounced for racial minorities (Cohen's d = -0.38-0.31-0.25, P = 0.02) and was related to trust in the vignette physician (change in R = 0.23, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a relative reluctance to embrace personalized medicine technology, especially among racial minorities, and highlights enhancement of adherence through improved doctor- patient relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21270639      PMCID: PMC3240937          DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182056133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  36 in total

1.  The importance of trust for ethics, law, and public policy.

Authors:  Mark A Hall
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Are medical and nonmedical uses of large-scale genomic markers conflating genetics and 'race'?

Authors:  Charles N Rotimi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Disparities in genetic testing: thinking outside the BRCA box.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The Genetic Counseling Video Project (GCVP): models of practice.

Authors:  D Roter; L Ellington; L Hamby Erby; S Larson; W Dudley
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

5.  Patient trust: is it related to patient-centered behavior of primary care physicians?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Sean Meldrum; Peter Franks; Cleveland G Shields; Paul Duberstein; Susan H McDaniel; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients.

Authors:  M van Ryn; J Burke
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Views on personalized medicine: do the attitudes of African American and white prescription drug consumers differ?

Authors:  M De Marco; S Cykert; N Coad; K Doost; J Schaal; B White; D Young; M R Isler; G Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Patient characteristics and experiences associated with trust in specialist physicians.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Tejal K Gandhi; E John Orav; David W Bates; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-10

9.  The rapid estimate of adult literacy in genetics (REAL-G): a means to assess literacy deficits in the context of genetics.

Authors:  Lori H Erby; Debra Roter; Susan Larson; Juhee Cho
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Racial/ethnic differences in physician distrust in the United States.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Karima L Ravenell; Suzanne McMurphy; Mary Putt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Concept-based learning of personalized prescribing.

Authors:  Robert Rissmann; Eline A Dubois; Kari L Franson; Adam F Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Michael J Bamshad; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Patient Perceptions of Care as Influenced by a Large Institutional Pharmacogenomic Implementation Program.

Authors:  R P McKillip; B A Borden; P Galecki; S A Ham; L Patrick-Miller; J P Hall; S Hussain; K Danahey; M Siegler; M J Sorrentino; Y Sacro; A M Davis; D T Rubin; K Lipstreuer; T S Polonsky; R Nanda; W R Harper; J L Koyner; D L Burnet; W M Stadler; M J Ratain; D O Meltzer; P H O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Choices for return of primary and secondary genomic research results of 790 members of families with Mendelian disease.

Authors:  Katie Fiallos; Carolyn Applegate; Debra Jh Mathews; Juli Bollinger; Amanda L Bergner; Cynthia A James
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Racial minority group interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing: findings from the PGen study.

Authors:  Latrice Landry; Daiva Elena Nielsen; Deanna Alexis Carere; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-09-04

6.  International survey of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and their attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  Naveen L Pereira; Derek So; Jang-Ho Bae; Ivan Chavez; Myung Ho Jeong; Sang Wook Kim; Mina Madan; John Graham; Fearghas O'Cochlain; Nicole Pauley; Ryan J Lennon; Kent Bailey; Ahmed Hasan; Linnea M Baudhuin; Malcolm R Bell; Amir Lerman; Shaun Goodman; Verghese Mathew; Michael Farkouh; Charanjit S Rihal
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk: a pilot survey.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Karen J Ruth; David Yt Chen; Laura M Gross; Veda N Giri
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.857

9.  Self-guided management of exome and whole-genome sequencing results: changing the results return model.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Seema M Jamal; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 8.822

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.