Literature DB >> 27981566

Patient Perceptions of Care as Influenced by a Large Institutional Pharmacogenomic Implementation Program.

R P McKillip1, B A Borden2, P Galecki2, S A Ham3, L Patrick-Miller4, J P Hall2, S Hussain2, K Danahey2,5, M Siegler2,4,6,7, M J Sorrentino2,4, Y Sacro2,4, A M Davis2,4, D T Rubin2,4, K Lipstreuer2,4, T S Polonsky2,4, R Nanda2,4, W R Harper2,4, J L Koyner2,4, D L Burnet2,4, W M Stadler2,4, M J Ratain2,4,7, D O Meltzer3,4, P H O'Donnell2,4,7.   

Abstract

Despite growing clinical use of genomic information, patient perceptions of genomic-based care are poorly understood. We prospectively studied patient-physician pairs who participated in an institutional pharmacogenomic implementation program. Trust/privacy/empathy/medical decision-making (MDM)/personalized care dimensions were assessed through patient surveys after clinic visits at which physicians had access to preemptive pharmacogenomic results (Likert scale, 1 = minimum/5 = maximum; mean [SD]). From 2012-2015, 1,261 surveys were issued to 507 patients, with 792 (62.8%) returned. Privacy, empathy, MDM, and personalized care scores were significantly higher after visits when physicians considered pharmacogenomic results. Importantly, personalized care scores were significantly higher after physicians used pharmacogenomic information to guide medication changes (4.0 [1.4] vs. 3.0 [1.6]; P < 0.001) compared with prescribing visits without genomic guidance. Multivariable modeling controlling for clinical factors confirmed personalized care scores were more favorable after visits with genomic-influenced prescribing (odds ratio [OR] = 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] = (1.31-8.14); P < 0.05). Physicians seem to individualize care when utilizing pharmacogenomic results and this decision-making augmentation is perceived positively by patients.
© 2016 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27981566      PMCID: PMC5474215          DOI: 10.1002/cpt.586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  35 in total

1.  Primary care physicians' attitudes and practices regarding cancer genetics: a comparison of 2001 with 1996 survey results.

Authors:  Lois C Friedman; H Paul Cooper; John A Webb; Armin D Weinberg; Sharon E Plon
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  An overview of 19 instruments assessing the doctor-patient relationship: different models or concepts are used.

Authors:  Rhona M Eveleigh; Esther Muskens; Hiske van Ravesteijn; Inge van Dijk; Eric van Rijswijk; Peter Lucassen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Pharmacogenomics in the clinic.

Authors:  Mary V Relling; William E Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Building the foundation for genomics in precision medicine.

Authors:  Samuel J Aronson; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians.

Authors:  D H Thom; K M Ribisl; A L Stewart; D A Luke
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Public perspectives about pharmacogenetic testing and managing ancillary findings.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Genevieve Tindall; Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-11-02

7.  Physicians' empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Hojat; Daniel Z Louis; Fred W Markham; Richard Wender; Carol Rabinowitz; Joseph S Gonnella
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 8.  The 1200 patients project: creating a new medical model system for clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  P H O'Donnell; A Bush; J Spitz; K Danahey; D Saner; S Das; N J Cox; M J Ratain
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Survey of US public attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  S B Haga; J M O'Daniel; G M Tindall; I R Lipkus; R Agans
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.550

10.  Patients' attitudes about the use of placebo treatments: telephone survey.

Authors:  Sara Chandros Hull; Luana Colloca; Andrew Avins; Nancy P Gordon; Carol P Somkin; Ted J Kaptchuk; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-07-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Assessment of patient perceptions of genomic testing to inform pharmacogenomic implementation.

Authors:  Yee Ming Lee; Ryan P McKillip; Brittany A Borden; Catherine E Klammer; Mark J Ratain; Peter H O'Donnell
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetic Decision Support Tools: A New Paradigm for Late-Life Depression?

Authors:  Ryan Abbott; Donald D Chang; Harris A Eyre; Chad A Bousman; David A Merrill; Helen Lavretsky
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 3.  Pharmacogenetic Testing Options Relevant to Psychiatry in Canada: Options de tests pharmacogénétiques pertinents en psychiatrie au Canada.

Authors:  Abdullah Al Maruf; Mikayla Fan; Paul D Arnold; Daniel J Müller; Katherine J Aitchison; Chad A Bousman
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.356

4.  International survey of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and their attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  Naveen L Pereira; Derek So; Jang-Ho Bae; Ivan Chavez; Myung Ho Jeong; Sang Wook Kim; Mina Madan; John Graham; Fearghas O'Cochlain; Nicole Pauley; Ryan J Lennon; Kent Bailey; Ahmed Hasan; Linnea M Baudhuin; Malcolm R Bell; Amir Lerman; Shaun Goodman; Verghese Mathew; Michael Farkouh; Charanjit S Rihal
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Genophenotypic Factors and Pharmacogenomics in Adverse Drug Reactions.

Authors:  Ramón Cacabelos; Vinogran Naidoo; Lola Corzo; Natalia Cacabelos; Juan C Carril
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Systematic review of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment for cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Ye Zhu; Kristi M Swanson; Ricardo L Rojas; Zhen Wang; Jennifer L St Sauver; Sue L Visscher; Larry J Prokop; Suzette J Bielinski; Liewei Wang; Richard Weinshilboum; Bijan J Borah
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Patients' Perceptions of Pharmacogenetic Testing and Access to Their Results: State of the Art in Spain and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pablo Zubiaur; David Nicolás Prósper-Cuesta; Jesús Novalbos; Gina Mejía-Abril; Marcos Navares-Gómez; Gonzalo Villapalos-García; Paula Soria-Chacartegui; Francisco Abad-Santos
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.