Literature DB >> 28868574

Racial minority group interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing: findings from the PGen study.

Latrice Landry1,2,3, Daiva Elena Nielsen2,4,5, Deanna Alexis Carere6, J Scott Roberts7, Robert C Green8,9,10,11,12.   

Abstract

There is little information regarding direct-to-consumer (DTC) personal genetic testing (PGT) in non-White racial minorities. Using a web-based survey, we compared the pretest interests and attitudes toward DTC-PGT of racial minority and White DTC-PGT customers of 23andMe and Pathway Genomics using chi-square tests and multinomial regression. Data were available for 1487 participants (1389 White, 44 Black, and 54 Asian). Survey responses were similar across racial groups, although a greater proportion of Blacks compared to Whites reported being "very interested" in genetic information related to traits (91.9 vs. 70.8%, p = 0.009). A greater proportion of Asians compared to Whites reported that a "very important" consideration for pursuing DTC-PGT was limited information about their family health history (58.0 vs. 37.5%, p = 0.002). While a number of significant differences between groups were observed in unadjusted analyses, they did not remain significant after adjustment. This study provides a preliminary view of the interests for purchasing DTC-PGT among customers with racial minority backgrounds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asians; Blacks; Direct-to-consumer; Genetic testing; Interests and attitudes; Racial minorities

Year:  2017        PMID: 28868574      PMCID: PMC5614887          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0325-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  19 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic differences in direct-to-consumer genetic tests awareness in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic and numeracy correlates.

Authors:  Aisha T Langford; Ken Resnicow; J Scott Roberts; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations.

Authors:  Diana S Catz; Nancy S Green; Jonathan N Tobin; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Penny Kyler; Ann Umemoto; Jennifer Cernoch; Roxane Brown; Fredericka Wolman
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2005

3.  Perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic tests among members of a large managed care organization.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Nicole Wagner; Anh Quynh Le; Eve Halterman; Nadine Cornish; James W Dearing
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Differences in the patterns of health care system distrust between blacks and whites.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Suzanne McMurphy; Lorraine T Dean; Ellyn Micco; Mary Putt; Chanita Hughes Halbert; J Sanford Schwartz; Pamela Sankar; Reed E Pyeritz; Barbara Bernhardt; Judy A Shea
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.

Authors:  Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  The influence of health care policies and health care system distrust on willingness to undergo genetic testing.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Mary Putt; Chanita Hughes Halbert; David Grande; Jerome Sanford Schwartz; Kaijun Liao; Noora Marcus; Mirar Bristol Demeter; Judy Shea
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Awareness of cancer susceptibility genetic testing: the 2000, 2005, and 2010 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  Phuong L Mai; Susan Thomas Vadaparampil; Nancy Breen; Timothy S McNeel; Louise Wideroff; Barry I Graubard
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests from four state population-based surveys, and implications for clinical and public health practice.

Authors:  Katherine Kolor; Debra Duquette; Amy Zlot; Joan Foland; Beth Anderson; Rebecca Giles; Jennifer Wrathall; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Increasing Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Health Care Access, Internet Use, and Population Density Correlates.

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Sarah E Gollust; Sana Naveed; Richard P Moser
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-30

10.  Differential use of available genetic tests among primary care physicians in the United States: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Alexandra E Shields; Wylie Burke; Douglas E Levy
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  10 in total

1.  Sequencing Newborns: A Call for Nuanced Use of Genomic Technologies.

Authors:  Josephine Johnston; John D Lantos; Aaron Goldenberg; Flavia Chen; Erik Parens; Barbara A Koenig
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Statistical Detection of Relatives Typed with Disjoint Forensic and Biomedical Loci.

Authors:  Jaehee Kim; Michael D Edge; Bridget F B Algee-Hewitt; Jun Z Li; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Video education about genetic privacy and patient perspectives about sharing prenatal genetic data: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Christian M Parobek; Margaret M Thorsen; Phinnara Has; Paula Lorenzi; Melissa A Clark; Melissa L Russo; Adam K Lewkowitz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 10.693

Review 4.  Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.

Authors:  Alexandra Cernat; Naazish S Bashir; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-02-16

5.  Genetic counseling and testing for Asian Americans: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Young; Julie Mak; Talia Stanley; Michelle Bass; Mildred K Cho; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Ethical concerns relating to genetic risk scores for suicide.

Authors:  Anna Docherty; Brent Kious; Teneille Brown; Leslie Francis; Louisa Stark; Brooks Keeshin; Jeffrey Botkin; Emily DiBlasi; Doug Gray; Hilary Coon
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.568

7.  Willingness to Participate in a National Precision Medicine Cohort: Attitudes of Chronic Kidney Disease Patients at a Cleveland Public Hospital.

Authors:  Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Dana C Crawford; Aaron Goldenberg; Anne Slaven; Julie Pencak; Marleen Schachere; William S Bush; John R Sedor; John F O'Toole
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2018-06-26

8.  Physician Experience with Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing in Kaiser Permanente.

Authors:  M Cabell Jonas; Pim Suwannarat; Andrea Burnett-Hartman; Nikki Carroll; Michelle Turner; Kristen Janes; Christine Truong; Erica Blum-Barnett; Nazneen Aziz; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2019-11-01

9.  Opinions of African American adults about the use of apolipoprotein L1 (ApoL1) genetic testing in living kidney donation and transplantation.

Authors:  Margaret Berrigan; Jasmine Austrie; Aaron Fleishman; Kenneth P Tercyak; Martin R Pollak; Martha Pavlakis; Vinayak Rohan; Prabhakar K Baliga; Liise K Kayler; Thomas H Feeley; James R Rodrigue
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Genomics for all in the 21st century?

Authors:  Martina C Cornel; Vence L Bonham
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-09-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.