AIMS: Although recent advances in pharmacogenomics are making possible the use of genetic testing to determine the best medication for patients, little is known about how patients view such procedures. The aims for this study that were developed collaboratively as part of a community-academic partnership are: (1) What are the attitudes and perceptions of prescription drug consumers concerning personalized medicine and genetic testing for drug compatibility and how do they differ between African American and white patients? (2) What are the attitudes and perceptions of patients concerning race-based prescribing and how do they differ between African American and white patients? METHODS: We conducted 6 focus groups, 2 with white participants and 4 with African American participants. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to ascertain common themes. RESULTS: Our results suggest that personalized medicine and genetic testing, though not well understood by lay persons, were considered positive advances in medicine. However, participants also voiced concerns about these advances that differed by race. CONCLUSION: This study points to the need to include perspectives of at-risk communities as we move toward wider use of this technology.
AIMS: Although recent advances in pharmacogenomics are making possible the use of genetic testing to determine the best medication for patients, little is known about how patients view such procedures. The aims for this study that were developed collaboratively as part of a community-academic partnership are: (1) What are the attitudes and perceptions of prescription drug consumers concerning personalized medicine and genetic testing for drug compatibility and how do they differ between African American and white patients? (2) What are the attitudes and perceptions of patients concerning race-based prescribing and how do they differ between African American and white patients? METHODS: We conducted 6 focus groups, 2 with white participants and 4 with African American participants. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to ascertain common themes. RESULTS: Our results suggest that personalized medicine and genetic testing, though not well understood by lay persons, were considered positive advances in medicine. However, participants also voiced concerns about these advances that differed by race. CONCLUSION: This study points to the need to include perspectives of at-risk communities as we move toward wider use of this technology.
Authors: Jennifer L Bevan; Jonh A Lynch; Tasha N Dubriwny; Tina M Harris; Paul J Achter; Amy L Reeder; Celeste M Condit Journal: Genet Med Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Diana S Catz; Nancy S Green; Jonathan N Tobin; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Penny Kyler; Ann Umemoto; Jennifer Cernoch; Roxane Brown; Fredericka Wolman Journal: Community Genet Date: 2005
Authors: Yee Ming Lee; Ryan P McKillip; Brittany A Borden; Catherine E Klammer; Mark J Ratain; Peter H O'Donnell Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: K Lachance; S Korol; E O'Meara; A Ducharme; N Racine; M Liszkowski; J L Rouleau; G B Pelletier; M Carrier; M White; S de Denus Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Grace Lee; Lisa A Varughese; Laura Conway; Carol Stojinski; Sandhya Ashokkumar; Karen Monono; William Matthai; Daniel M Kolansky; Jay Giri; Sony Tuteja Journal: Per Med Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Sadaf Qureshi; Asam Latif; Laura Condon; Ralph K Akyea; Joe Kai; Nadeem Qureshi Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 2.638
Authors: Morgan Butrick; Debra Roter; Kimberly Kaphingst; Lori H Erby; Carlton Haywood; Mary Catherine Beach; Howard P Levy Journal: Genet Med Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Gabriel A Lazarin; Imran S Haque; Shivani Nazareth; Kevin Iori; A Scott Patterson; Jessica L Jacobson; John R Marshall; William K Seltzer; Pasquale Patrizio; Eric A Evans; Balaji S Srinivasan Journal: Genet Med Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 8.822