Literature DB >> 25537954

Phonological similarity and orthographic similarity affect probed serial recall of Chinese characters.

Yi-Chen Lin1, Hsiang-Yu Chen, Yvonne C Lai, Denise H Wu.   

Abstract

The previous literature on working memory (WM) has indicated that verbal materials are dominantly retained in phonological representations, whereas other linguistic information (e.g., orthography, semantics) only contributes to verbal WM minimally, if not negligibly. Although accumulating evidence has suggested that multiple linguistic components jointly support verbal WM, the visual/orthographic contribution has rarely been addressed in alphabetic languages, possibly due to the difficulty of dissociating the effects of word forms from the effects of their pronunciations in relatively shallow orthography. In the present study, we examined whether the orthographic representations of Chinese characters support the retention of verbal materials in this language of deep orthography. In Experiments 1a and 2, we independently manipulated the phonological and orthographic similarity of horizontal and vertical characters, respectively, and found that participants' accuracy of probed serial recall was reduced by both similar pronunciations and shared phonetic radicals in the to-be-remembered stimuli. Moreover, Experiment 1b showed that only the effect of phonological, but not that of orthographic, similarity was affected by concurrent articulatory suppression. Taken together, the present results indicate the indispensable contribution of orthographic representations to verbal WM of Chinese characters, and suggest that the linguistic characteristics of a specific language not only determine long-term linguistic-processing mechanisms, but also delineate the organization of verbal WM for that language.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25537954     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0495-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  28 in total

1.  Dissociating semantic and phonological maintenance using fMRI.

Authors:  Geeta Shivde; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Interference with visual short-term memory.

Authors:  R H Logie; G M Zucco; A D Baddeley
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-10

3.  Concreteness effects in different tasks: implications for models of short-term memory.

Authors:  Cristina Romani; Sheila McAlpine; Randi C Martin
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Visual similarity effects on short-term memory for order: the case of verbally labeled pictorial stimuli.

Authors:  Marie Poirer; Jean Saint-Aubin; Karen Musselwhite; Thulasi Mohanadas; Ghuson Mahammed
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

5.  On the existence of semantic working memory: evidence for direct semantic maintenance.

Authors:  Geeta Shivde; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Feature binding in visual short-term memory is unaffected by task-irrelevant changes of location, shape, and color.

Authors:  Robert H Logie; James R Brockmole; Snehlata Jaswal
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

7.  Does visuo-spatial working memory generally contribute to immediate serial letter recall?

Authors:  A Fürstenberg; R Rummer; J Schweppe
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-12-24

8.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison.

Authors:  R Frost; L Katz; S Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Short-term memory for Chinese characters and radicals.

Authors:  C W Hue; J R Erickson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-05

10.  The influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long-term memory for word sequences.

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  7 in total

1.  Perspectives on working memory: introduction to the special issue.

Authors:  Robert H Logie; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

2.  Set size and long-term memory/lexical effects in immediate serial recall: Testing the impurity principle.

Authors:  Ian Neath; Aimée M Surprenant
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-04

3.  Visual similarity effects in immediate serial recall and (sometimes) in immediate serial recognition.

Authors:  Chrissy M Chubala; Dominic Guitard; Ian Neath; Jean Saint-Aubin; Aimée M Surprenant
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

4.  Examining the Effect of Semantic Relatedness on the Acquisition of English Collocations.

Authors:  Michael Yi-Chao Jiang; Morris Siu-Yung Jong; Chi-Shing Tse; Ching-Sing Chai
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-04

5.  Inter-character Orthographic Similarity Effects on the Recognition of Chinese Coordinative Compound Words.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Weiqi Zhao; Hye K Pae
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-02

6.  Exploring the use of phonological and semantic representations in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Dominic Guitard; Nathaniel R Greene; Sylvain Fiset
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.140

7.  Recalling visual serial order for verbal sequences.

Authors:  Robert H Logie; Satoru Saito; Aiko Morita; Samarth Varma; Dennis Norris
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.