Literature DB >> 10788659

Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features.

G W Humphreys1, C Cinel, J Wolfe, A Olson, N Klempen.   

Abstract

We present neuropsychological evidence demonstrating that the binding of form elements into shapes dissociates from the binding of surface detail to shape. Data are reported from a patient with bilateral parietal lesions, GK, who manifests left-side visual extinction along with many illusory conjunctions when asked to discriminate both surface and form information about stimuli. We show that there are effects of grouping on both extinction and illusory conjunctions when the tasks require report of object shape. In contrast, illusory conjunctions involving surface and form information were unaffected by grouping based on shape. In addition, grouping was stronger when forms were presented within the same hemifield than when they appeared in different hemifields, whilst illusory conjunctions of form and colour occurred equally often within and across hemifields. These results support a two-stage account of visual binding: form elements are first bound together locally into shapes, and this is followed by a second stage of binding in which shapes are integrated with surface details. The second but not the first stage of binding is impaired in this patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10788659     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00042-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  18 in total

1.  The spatiotemporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: combined high-density electrical mapping, source analysis, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Glenn R Wylie; Beth A Higgins; Daniel C Javitt; Charles E Schroeder; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Attending to space within and between objects: Implications from a patient with Balint's syndrome.

Authors:  Lynn C Robertson; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the relations between implicit and explicit spatial binding: evidence from Balint's syndrome.

Authors:  Caterina Cinel; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  How the deployment of attention determines what we see.

Authors:  Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2006-08-01

6.  Feature binding in visual short-term memory is unaffected by task-irrelevant changes of location, shape, and color.

Authors:  Robert H Logie; James R Brockmole; Snehlata Jaswal
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

7.  Numerical-spatial representation affects spatial coding: binding errors across the numerical distance effect.

Authors:  Isabel Arend; Sharon Naparstek; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

8.  Common Dorsal Stream Substrates for the Mapping of Surface Texture to Object Parts and Visual Spatial Processing.

Authors:  Valentinos Zachariou; Christine V Nikas; Zaid N Safiullah; Marlene Behrmann; Roberta Klatzky; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Feature-coding transitions to conjunction-coding with progression through human visual cortex.

Authors:  Rosemary A Cowell; Krystal R Leger; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The development of organized visual search.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Tilbe Göksun; Anjan Chatterjee; Sarah Zelonis; Anika Mehta; Sabrina E Smith
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.