Literature DB >> 30856041

Overlapping and distinct contributions of stimulus location and of spatial context to nonspatial visual short-term memory.

Ying Cai1,2, Andrew D Sheldon3, Qing Yu2, Bradley R Postle2,4.   

Abstract

Stimulus location is not always informative during visual short-term memory (VSTM) for nonspatial features. Nevertheless, there is considerable evidence for the automatic encoding and retention of location information, regardless of its task relevance. To explore the functional and neural bases of the representation of spatial context in VSTM for nonspatial information, functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed while subjects performed delayed recall for the orientation of individual stimuli. Stimulus location varied across trials, and although this information was irrelevant for task performance, multivariate pattern analysis decoding of stimulus location sustained across trials, and also the decoding strength, predicted the precision of the recall of orientation. The influence of spatial context on the representation of orientation was operationalized by comparing the orientation reconstructions with multivariate inverted encoding models (IEM) trained in location context-dependent vs. -independent data. Although orientation reconstructions were robust for both location-dependent and location-independent IEMs, they were markedly stronger for the former. Furthermore, the functional relevance of location context was demonstrated by the fact that only the location-dependent neural representations of stimulus orientation predicted recall precision. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Neural representation strength of stimulus location predicts the precision of visual short-term memory (VSTM) recall of nonspatial stimulus, even when this information is task irrelevant. Neural representations of nonspatial stimuli that incorporate location context are stronger than those that do not, and only the former representations are strongly linked to behavior. The contributions to nonspatial VSTM performance of the representation of location context are at least partly distinct from those of the representation of stimulus content.

Keywords:  inverted encoding model; location context; visual short-term memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30856041      PMCID: PMC6485733          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00062.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  28 in total

1.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images.

Authors:  M Jenkinson; S Smith
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Flexibility in Visual Working Memory: Accurate Change Detection in the Face of Irrelevant Variations in Position.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Edward K Vogel; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-01-13

3.  Rehearsal in spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides; P A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Feature binding in visual short-term memory is unaffected by task-irrelevant changes of location, shape, and color.

Authors:  Robert H Logie; James R Brockmole; Snehlata Jaswal
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  An interference model of visual working memory.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Hsuan-Yu Lin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The relationship between working memory storage and elevated activity as measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adam C Riggall; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Remembering "what" brings along "where" in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Christy Marshuetz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-02

9.  Decoding and reconstructing color from responses in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Gijs Joost Brouwer; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The positional-specificity effect reveals a passive-trace contribution to visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Bradley R Postle; Edward Awh; John T Serences; David W Sutterer; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Muhammet I Sahan; Andrew D Sheldon; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Drives the Prioritization of Self-Associated Stimuli in Working Memory.

Authors:  Shouhang Yin; Taiyong Bi; Antao Chen; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Understanding occipital and parietal contributions to visual working memory: Commentary on Xu (2020).

Authors:  Chunyue Teng; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2021-02-15

4.  Attention Biases Competition for Visual Representation via Dissociable Influences from Frontal and Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Andrew D Sheldon; Elyana Saad; Muhammet I Sahan; Emma E Meyering; Michael J Starrett; Joshua J LaRocque; Nathan S Rose; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.420

5.  The Role of Location-Context Binding in Nonspatial Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Ying Cai; Jacqueline M Fulvio; Qing Yu; Andrew D Sheldon; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-11-30

6.  Spatial specificity of feature-based interaction between working memory and visual processing.

Authors:  Chunyue Teng; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Different states of priority recruit different neural representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Qing Yu; Chunyue Teng; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 9.593

8.  Spatially Specific Working Memory Activity in the Human Superior Colliculus.

Authors:  Masih Rahmati; Kevin DeSimone; Clayton E Curtis; Kartik K Sreenivasan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Working memory representations in visual cortex mediate distraction effects.

Authors:  Grace E Hallenbeck; Thomas C Sprague; Masih Rahmati; Kartik K Sreenivasan; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Delay-period activity in frontal, parietal, and occipital cortex tracks noise and biases in visual working memory.

Authors:  Qing Yu; Matthew F Panichello; Ying Cai; Bradley R Postle; Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 9.593

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.