Literature DB >> 21258320

Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site.

Anne Letessier1, Gaël A Millot, Stéphane Koundrioukoff, Anne-Marie Lachagès, Nicolas Vogt, R Scott Hansen, Bernard Malfoy, Olivier Brison, Michelle Debatisse.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites have long been identified by cytogeneticists as chromosomal regions prone to breakage upon replication stress. They are increasingly recognized to be preferential targets for oncogene-induced DNA damage in pre-neoplastic lesions and hotspots for chromosomal rearrangements in various cancers. Common fragile site instability was attributed to the fact that they contain sequences prone to form secondary structures that may impair replication fork movement, possibly leading to fork collapse resulting in DNA breaks. Here we show, in contrast to this view, that the fragility of FRA3B--the most active common fragile site in human lymphocytes--does not rely on fork slowing or stalling but on a paucity of initiation events. Indeed, in lymphoblastoid cells, but not in fibroblasts, initiation events are excluded from a FRA3B core extending approximately 700 kilobases, which forces forks coming from flanking regions to cover long distances in order to complete replication. We also show that origins of the flanking regions fire in mid-S phase, leaving the site incompletely replicated upon fork slowing. Notably, FRA3B instability is specific to cells showing this particular initiation pattern. The fact that both origin setting and replication timing are highly plastic in mammalian cells explains the tissue specificity of common fragile site instability we observed. Thus, we propose that common fragile sites correspond to the latest initiation-poor regions to complete replication in a given cell type. For historical reasons, common fragile sites have been essentially mapped in lymphocytes. Therefore, common fragile site contribution to chromosomal rearrangements in tumours should be reassessed after mapping fragile sites in the cell type from which each tumour originates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21258320     DOI: 10.1038/nature09745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  31 in total

Review 1.  Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break".

Authors:  R Rothstein; B Michel; S Gangloff
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Eukaryotic chromosome DNA replication: where, when, and how?

Authors:  Hisao Masai; Seiji Matsumoto; Zhiying You; Naoko Yoshizawa-Sugata; Masako Oda
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

3.  Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Karen Stout-Weider; Klaus Hermann; Evelin Schrock; Thomas Heiden
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  The molecular basis of fragile sites in human chromosomes.

Authors:  G R Sutherland; R I Richards
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Replication dynamics at common fragile site FRA6E.

Authors:  Elisa Palumbo; Laura Matricardi; Elena Tosoni; Aaron Bensimon; Antonella Russo
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 6.  Common chromosomal fragile sites and cancer: focus on FRA16D.

Authors:  Louise V O'Keefe; Robert I Richards
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones.

Authors:  Rita S Cha; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Replication stress induces tumor-like microdeletions in FHIT/FRA3B.

Authors:  Sandra G Durkin; Ryan L Ragland; Martin F Arlt; Jennifer G Mulle; Stephen T Warren; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Sandra G Durkin; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

10.  Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Ichiro Hiratani; Tyrone Ryba; Mari Itoh; Tomoki Yokochi; Michaela Schwaiger; Chia-Wei Chang; Yung Lyou; Tim M Townes; Dirk Schübeler; David M Gilbert
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  218 in total

Review 1.  Making a long story short: noncoding RNAs and chromosome change.

Authors:  J D Brown; S E Mitchell; R J O'Neill
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Regulation of DNA replication during development.

Authors:  Jared Nordman; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Molecular profiling of common fragile sites in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Benoî Le Tallec; Bernard Dutrillaux; Anne-Marie Lachages; Gael Armel Millot; Olivier Brison; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  Genomic rearrangements at the FRA2H common fragile site frequently involve non-homologous recombination events across LTR and L1(LINE) repeats.

Authors:  Lena M Brueckner; Evgeny Sagulenko; Elisa M Hess; Diana Zheglo; Anne Blumrich; Manfred Schwab; Larissa Savelyeva
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Chromatin replication and epigenome maintenance.

Authors:  Constance Alabert; Anja Groth
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance.

Authors:  Jiri Lukas; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Evidence for chromosome fragility at the frataxin locus in Friedreich ataxia.

Authors:  Daman Kumari; Bruce Hayward; Asako J Nakamura; William M Bonner; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  Regulation of recombination and genomic maintenance.

Authors:  Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  Mathematical modeling of genome replication.

Authors:  Renata Retkute; Conrad A Nieduszynski; Alessandro de Moura
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2012-09-17

10.  Analysis of the t(3;8) of hereditary renal cell carcinoma: a palindrome-mediated translocation.

Authors:  Takema Kato; Colleen P Franconi; Molly B Sheridan; April M Hacker; Hidehito Inagakai; Thomas W Glover; Martin F Arlt; Harry A Drabkin; Robert M Gemmill; Hiroki Kurahashi; Beverly S Emanuel
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2014-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.