Literature DB >> 21253256

Acute ankle injuries: clinical/radiologic assessment in diagnosis.

S Lloyd.   

Abstract

Acute ankle injuries represent a large burden of illness in the primary care/emergency setting. Concern has been expressed in the medical literature about the unnecessary use of X-rays in the assessment of these patients. A literature review was conducted to address the question: "Can clinical examination alone accurately diagnose fractures and sprains in patients with acute ankle injuries?" Published reports offer inconsistent conclusions on the value of clinical criteria in the diagnosis of fractures or sprains. These inconsistent conclusions appear to result from numerous biases, different patient populations studied, varied interpretations of normal and abnormal results, and different groups of examiners. The only criteria associated with the diagnosis of fracture in more than one study are age greater than 40 years, inability to bear weight on examination, "point" or "bone" tenderness, and swelling. Until consistent results are available, no change in the rate of X-ray referral should be expected.

Entities:  

Year:  1988        PMID: 21253256      PMCID: PMC2219194     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  10 in total

1.  Diagnosis and treatment of sprained ankle.

Authors:  A W LETTIN
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1963-04-20

2.  Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries.

Authors:  M G Dunlop; T F Beattie; G K White; G M Raab; R I Doull
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-06

3.  Need for radiographs in the acutely injured ankle.

Authors:  J Svenson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Limiting the use of routine radiography for acute ankle injuries.

Authors:  W P Cockshott; J K Jenkin; M Pui
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Rationalising requests for x-ray examination of acute ankle injuries.

Authors:  G de Lacey; S Bradbrooke
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-06-16

6.  Can more efficient use be made of x ray examinations in the accident and emergency department?

Authors:  D N Gleadhill; J Y Thomson; P Simms
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-04-11

7.  Clinical assessment of apparently sprained ankle and detection of fracture.

Authors:  A P Montague; R F McQuillan
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Inversion injuries of the ankle: clinical assessment and radiographic review.

Authors:  S C Brooks; B T Potter; J B Rainey
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-02-21

9.  A protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-rays.

Authors:  D A Brand; W H Frazier; W C Kohlhepp; K M Shea; A M Hoefer; M D Ecker; P J Kornguth; M J Pais; T R Light
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-02-11       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The ankle injury--indications for the selective use of X-rays.

Authors:  T Vargish; W R Clarke; R A Young; A Jensen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.586

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules. Experience at a community hospital.

Authors:  K L McBride
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.275

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.