Literature DB >> 6409805

The ankle injury--indications for the selective use of X-rays.

T Vargish, W R Clarke, R A Young, A Jensen.   

Abstract

The radiograph is rapidly superseding the clinical examination as the diagnostic tool for acute ankle injuries. Twenty-four independent variables which might help distinguish between soft tissue injuries and fractures at the ankle were identified and then used prospectively to study 150 consecutive patients with ankle injuries. Nineteen patients had fractured ankles (12.7 per cent) and 131 (87.3 per cent) had soft tissue injuries. Only the patient's ability to bear weight on the injured ankle and the presence of tenderness over the lateral aspect of the ankle below the malleolus proved to be helpful. When these 2 signs were present together, regardless of all other variables, there was a 97.5 per cent probability of soft tissue injury P less than 0.005). This study suggests that careful patient assessment will permit more discriminating use of ankle X-rays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6409805     DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(83)90053-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  15 in total

1.  Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries.

Authors:  M G Dunlop; T F Beattie; G K White; G M Raab; R I Doull
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-06

2.  Overuse of concomitant foot radiographic series in patients sustaining minor ankle injuries.

Authors:  Jonelle Petscavage; Stephen R Baker; Kim Clarkin; Lyndon Luk
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-10-16

3.  Selective radiographic assessment of acute ankle injuries in the emergency department: barriers to implementation.

Authors:  S Lloyd
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Sprain or fracture? An analysis of 2000 ankle injuries.

Authors:  P Sujitkumar; J M Hadfield; D W Yates
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1986-06

5.  Grade III injuries of the lateral ligaments of the ankle: the incidence and a simple stress test.

Authors:  C L Muwanga; M Hellier; D N Quinton; J P Sloan; A F Dove
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1986-12

6.  Fractures not X-rayed.

Authors:  H R Guly
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1986-09

7.  Validation of Ottawa ankle rules protocol in Greek athletes: study in the emergency departments of a district general hospital and a sports injuries clinic.

Authors:  E Papacostas; N Malliaropoulos; A Papadopoulos; C Liouliakis
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Late diagnosis of a McFarland fracture: imaging and treatment.

Authors:  Panagiotis D Symeonidis; George Ath Konstantinidis; Panagiotis S Dionellis; John Ousantzopoulos; John Ousatzopoulos; Panagiotis K Givissis; Panagiotis G Givisis
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Acute ankle injuries: clinical/radiologic assessment in diagnosis.

Authors:  S Lloyd
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  A pilot study to assess the sensitivity and specificity of an intrasound device in the diagnosis of ankle fractures.

Authors:  A Dancocks; A Rouse; J Hiscox
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1997-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.