Literature DB >> 6781589

Inversion injuries of the ankle: clinical assessment and radiographic review.

S C Brooks, B T Potter, J B Rainey.   

Abstract

Inversion injuries of the ankle are a common cause of referral and presentation to accident units. They impose a load on radiographic services. A prospective trial was carried out to determine the accuracy of clinical examination. All patients were assessed clinically then examined radiographically, the clinical assessment missed 5% of the fractures. These, however, were all minor avulsion fractures or crush fractures and Tubigrip support was sufficient. Clinical examinations is, therefore, accurate and the need for most x-ray examination is questionable. X-ray examination should be reserved for patients with continuing pain or those who clinically have a fracture requiring immobilisation. This would produce a large saving in NHS resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6781589      PMCID: PMC1504464          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.282.6264.607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  3 in total

1.  Is radiological examination of the twisted ankle necessary?

Authors:  J S GARFIELD
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1960-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Department of inappropriate investigations.

Authors:  B Golberg
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-11-12

3.  Rationalising requests for x-ray examination of acute ankle injuries.

Authors:  G de Lacey; S Bradbrooke
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-06-16
  3 in total
  21 in total

1.  Prospective survey to verify the Ottawa ankle rules.

Authors:  S Perry; N Raby; P T Grant
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-07

2.  Clinical usefulness of the Ottawa Ankle Rules for detecting fractures of the ankle and midfoot.

Authors:  Michelle Jenkin; Michael R Sitler; John D Kelly
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries.

Authors:  M G Dunlop; T F Beattie; G K White; G M Raab; R I Doull
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-06

4.  Selective radiographic assessment of acute ankle injuries in the emergency department: barriers to implementation.

Authors:  S Lloyd
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Management of acute lateral ankle ligament injury in the athlete.

Authors:  Michel P J van den Bekerom; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Graham A McCollum; James D F Calder; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Sprain or fracture? An analysis of 2000 ankle injuries.

Authors:  P Sujitkumar; J M Hadfield; D W Yates
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1986-06

7.  Validation of Ottawa ankle rules protocol in Greek athletes: study in the emergency departments of a district general hospital and a sports injuries clinic.

Authors:  E Papacostas; N Malliaropoulos; A Papadopoulos; C Liouliakis
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Limiting the use of routine radiography for acute ankle injuries.

Authors:  W P Cockshott; J K Jenkin; M Pui
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Injuries to the lateral ligament of the ankle.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-12-08

10.  Sports injuries in an accident and emergency department.

Authors:  D A Watters; S Brooks; R A Elton; K Little
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1984-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.