Literature DB >> 6407744

Limiting the use of routine radiography for acute ankle injuries.

W P Cockshott, J K Jenkin, M Pui.   

Abstract

In the diagnosis of ankle injuries routine radiography is often productive. An international survey of the average number of radiographs made of injured ankles suggested that two projections are adequate to detect fractures. This was confirmed in a prospective study of 242 patients coming to a hospital emergency department with recent ankle injuries. All the fractures could be identified on an anteroposterior or a lateral projection, although some were more obvious on an oblique view. As well, all the fractures were associated with malleolar soft-tissue swelling. Thus, radiography for acute ankle injuries could safely be restricted to patients with soft-tissue swelling, and fractures could be diagnosed using only two routine projections, though for management purposes additional projections might be needed. With a policy of limiting the use of radiography substantial cost reductions are possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6407744      PMCID: PMC1875260     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN: 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  6 in total

1.  Is radiological examination of the twisted ankle necessary?

Authors:  J S GARFIELD
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1960-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Radiological diagnosis of lateral ligament lesion of the ankle. A comparison between talar tilt and anterior drawer sign.

Authors:  A Johannsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1978-06

3.  Isolated fractures of the posterior tibial lip at the ankle as demonstrated by an additional projection, the "poor" lateral view.

Authors:  J Mandell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Rationalising requests for x-ray examination of acute ankle injuries.

Authors:  G de Lacey; S Bradbrooke
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-06-16

5.  Inversion injuries of the ankle: clinical assessment and radiographic review.

Authors:  S C Brooks; B T Potter; J B Rainey
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-02-21

6.  A protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-rays.

Authors:  D A Brand; W H Frazier; W C Kohlhepp; K M Shea; A M Hoefer; M D Ecker; P J Kornguth; M J Pais; T R Light
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-02-11       Impact factor: 91.245

  6 in total
  11 in total

1.  [Evaluation and treatment of lateral ankle sprain in the emergency department: is systematic radiography necessary?].

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; A Corriveau; P O Nadeau
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries.

Authors:  M G Dunlop; T F Beattie; G K White; G M Raab; R I Doull
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-06

3.  Use of radiographic projections of knee.

Authors:  W P Cockshott; N T Racoveanu; D A Burrows; M Ferrier
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Selective radiographic assessment of acute ankle injuries in the emergency department: barriers to implementation.

Authors:  S Lloyd
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Late diagnosis of a McFarland fracture: imaging and treatment.

Authors:  Panagiotis D Symeonidis; George Ath Konstantinidis; Panagiotis S Dionellis; John Ousantzopoulos; John Ousatzopoulos; Panagiotis K Givissis; Panagiotis G Givisis
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Acute ankle injuries: clinical/radiologic assessment in diagnosis.

Authors:  S Lloyd
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules. Experience at a community hospital.

Authors:  K L McBride
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: physicians' attitudes and practice.

Authors:  I G Stiell; I McDowell; R C Nair; H Aeta; G Greenberg; R D McKnight; J Ahuja
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Clinical value of the Ottawa ankle rules for diagnosis of fractures in acute ankle injuries.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Shi-min Chang; Guang-rong Yu; Zhi-tao Rao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Radiographic imaging for traumatic ankle injuries: a demand profile and investigation of radiological reporting timeframes from an Australian tertiary facility.

Authors:  Patrick Eastgate; Robert Davidson; Steven M McPhail
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.