Literature DB >> 111756

Rationalising requests for x-ray examination of acute ankle injuries.

G de Lacey, S Bradbrooke.   

Abstract

Radiographs of injured ankles represent about 1 in 50 of all radiological examinations. The notes and radiographs of 100 patients with ankle injuries were reviewed, and the films of a further 93 patients who had ankle fractures treated by immobilisation were also scrutinised to assess the presence of absence of soft tissue swelling over the malleoli. Any accompanying radiographs of the foot requested at the same time were also studied. In 65 of the 100 cases of ankle injury there was no soft tissue swelling, and none of the patients had a major fracture, while 92 of the 93 patients with a major fracture had soft tissue swelling at the level of the malleoli. In 32 of the 100 cases of ankle injury foot radiographs had also been requested, but only three foot injuries were found. If the simple maxim of "No swelling adjacent to a malleolus, no radiographs" were applied radiography of twisted ankles could be reduced by as much as two-thirds. Moreover, if this maxim included the rider "and no routine foot films" the total casualty radiographic work load could be reduced by 8%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 111756      PMCID: PMC1599166          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6178.1597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  2 in total

1.  Is radiological examination of the twisted ankle necessary?

Authors:  J S GARFIELD
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1960-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Department of inappropriate investigations.

Authors:  B Golberg
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-11-12
  2 in total
  14 in total

1.  Ultrasonic assessment of injuries to the lateral complex of the ankle.

Authors:  A K Singh; T S Malpass; G Walker
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1990-06

2.  [Evaluation and treatment of lateral ankle sprain in the emergency department: is systematic radiography necessary?].

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; A Corriveau; P O Nadeau
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries.

Authors:  M G Dunlop; T F Beattie; G K White; G M Raab; R I Doull
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-06

4.  Accuracy of chest radiograph interpretation by emergency physicians.

Authors:  Zohair Al aseri
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-09-09

5.  Selective radiographic assessment of acute ankle injuries in the emergency department: barriers to implementation.

Authors:  S Lloyd
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Sprain or fracture? An analysis of 2000 ankle injuries.

Authors:  P Sujitkumar; J M Hadfield; D W Yates
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1986-06

7.  Limiting the use of routine radiography for acute ankle injuries.

Authors:  W P Cockshott; J K Jenkin; M Pui
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Why do accident and emergency doctors request X-rays?

Authors:  R A Warren; D G Ferguson
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1984-09

9.  A critical time for diagnostic imaging.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-09-22

10.  Telephone advice in the accident and emergency department: a survey of current practice.

Authors:  R J Evans; M McCabe; H Allen; T Rainer; P W Richmond
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1993-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.