Literature DB >> 7054709

A protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-rays.

D A Brand, W H Frazier, W C Kohlhepp, K M Shea, A M Hoefer, M D Ecker, P J Kornguth, M J Pais, T R Light.   

Abstract

To help curb excessive radiography, we developed a protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-ray examination, and we tested the protocol prospectively in 848 patients to determine its safety and effectiveness. Strict adherence to the protocol would have reduced x-ray usage by 12 per cent for upper extremities and 19 per cent for lower extremities. The actual reductions were 5 per cent and 16 per cent, respectively, since further reductions were limited by patient's demands for x-ray examinations. One fracture in 287 were missed, but the treatment was appropriate and the outcome satisfactory. By eliminating superfluous x-ray procedures, the protocol could reduce charges by $79 million to $139 million nationwide, without compromising quality of care or increasing malpractice liability. Nevertheless, even the best protocol cannot eliminate all negative x-ray studies. These results should serve as a stimulus for judicious use of radiography, but also as a warning to avoid overzealous cost-containment strategies that would reduce x-ray usage to below a safe threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7054709     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198202113060604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  24 in total

1.  Double line sign: a helpful sonographic sign to detect occult fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Matthieu J C M Rutten; Gerrit J Jager; Maarten C de Waal Malefijt; Johan G Blickman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Influence of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on hospital practice: a multicentre study. Royal College of Radiologists Working Party.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-21

3.  How do clinical features help identify paediatric patients with fractures following blunt wrist trauma?

Authors:  A P Webster; S Goodacre; D Walker; D Burke
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  [Evaluation and treatment of lateral ankle sprain in the emergency department: is systematic radiography necessary?].

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; A Corriveau; P O Nadeau
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries.

Authors:  M G Dunlop; T F Beattie; G K White; G M Raab; R I Doull
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-06

6.  Accuracy of chest radiograph interpretation by emergency physicians.

Authors:  Zohair Al aseri
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-09-09

7.  Out-of-hours radiographs: the effect of resident registrar cover.

Authors:  D K Nouri; N Rashid; C N Jenkins
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1995-03

Review 8.  Physical diagnosis versus modern technology. A review.

Authors:  F T Fitzgerald
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-04

9.  Can the use of radiography of arms and legs in accident and emergency units be made more efficient?

Authors:  M C Charny; W P Ennis; C J Roberts; K T Evans
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-01-31

10.  Selective radiographic assessment of acute ankle injuries in the emergency department: barriers to implementation.

Authors:  S Lloyd
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.