Literature DB >> 21248244

Assessment of catheter tip contact force resulting in cardiac perforation in swine atria using force sensing technology.

Francesco Perna1, E Kevin Heist, Stephan B Danik, Conor D Barrett, Jeremy N Ruskin, Moussa Mansour.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Force sensing is a recently developed technology that allows the determination of the contact force (CF) at the tip of the catheter during electrophysiology procedures. Previous studies suggested that the optimal CF for adequate catheter contact ranges between 10 and 40 g. The aim of this study was to determine the CF needed to cause perforation in the swine atria. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Pericardial access was obtained at the beginning of the study in a swine model to drain pericardial effusions. Electroanatomic maps of the right atrium (RA) and left atrium (LA) were constructed. Ablation was performed using an irrigated-tip radiofrequency catheter equipped with force-sensing technology (30 W, 30 mL/min, for 30 seconds). Perforations of the LA and RA wall were intentionally performed in different locations with and without radiofrequency ablation. CF values preceding each perforation were recorded. A total of 111 cardiac perforations were achieved in 7 pigs. The overall average CF resulting in perforation was 175.8±60.4 g (range, 77 to 376 g). This was significantly lower after 30 seconds of radiofrequency delivery: 151.8±49.9 g versus 197±61.3 g (P=0.00005). The average value of CF resulting in perforation was not statistically different between the RA and the LA (169.6±61.6 g versus 181.7±59.3 g) (P=0.29).
CONCLUSIONS: Perforation of the atrial wall in a swine model can occur over a wide range of CF values. Perforation can occur with a CF as low as 77 g. Ablation reduces the perforating force by 23%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21248244     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.959429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  36 in total

1.  Novel catheter enabling simultaneous radiofrequency ablation and optical coherence reflectometry.

Authors:  D Herranz; Juan Lloret; Santiago Jiménez-Valero; J L Rubio-Guivernau; Eduardo Margallo-Balbás
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  THERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH® CATHETER - The Evidence So Far for Contact Force Technology and the Role of VISITAG™ MODULE.

Authors:  Tina Lin; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Roland Tilz
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-05-30

3.  SmartTouch™ - The Emerging Role of Contact Force Technology in Complex Catheter Ablation.

Authors:  Stephen P Page; Mehul Dhinoja
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2012-09

Review 4.  What Is the Appropriate Lesion Set for Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation?

Authors:  Jorge Romero; Carola Gianni; Andrea Natale; Luigi Di Biase
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-05

5.  2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Design and evaluation of safety operation VR training system for robotic catheter surgery.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Shuxiang Guo; Yaxin Li; Takashi Tamiya; Yu Song
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  Contact Force and Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  W Ullah; R J Schilling; T Wong
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

8.  Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kohki Nakamura; Shigeto Naito; Takehito Sasaki; Masahiro Nakano; Kentaro Minami; Yosuke Nakatani; Kentaro Ikeda; Eiji Yamashita; Koji Kumagai; Nobusada Funabashi; Shigeru Oshima
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 9.  Heart Rythm Society expert consensus statement on electrophysiology laboratory standards: process, protocols, equipment, personnel, and safety.

Authors:  David E Haines; Salwa Beheiry; Joseph G Akar; Janice L Baker; Doug Beinborn; John F Beshai; Neil Brysiewicz; Christine Chiu-Man; Kathryn K Collins; Matthew Dare; Kenneth Fetterly; John D Fisher; Richard Hongo; Samuel Irefin; John Lopez; John M Miller; James C Perry; David J Slotwiner; Gery F Tomassoni; Esther Weiss
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Which is the best catheter to perform atrial fibrillation ablation? A comparison between standard ThermoCool, SmartTouch, and Surround Flow catheters.

Authors:  Luigi Sciarra; Paolo Golia; Andrea Natalizia; Ermenegildo De Ruvo; Serena Dottori; Antonio Scarà; Alessio Borrelli; Lucia De Luca; Marco Rebecchi; Alessandro Fagagnini; Alberto Bandini; Fabrizio Guarracini; Marcello Galvani; Leonardo Calò
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.