Literature DB >> 16132974

Effect of slow, small movement on the vibration-evoked kinesthetic illusion.

P J Cordo1, V S Gurfinkel, S Brumagne, C Flores-Vieira.   

Abstract

The study reported in this paper investigated how vibration-evoked illusions of joint rotation are influenced by slow (0.3 degrees /s), small (2-4 degrees ) passive rotation of the joint. Normal human adults (n=15) matched the perceived position of the left ("reference") arm with the right ("matching") arm while vibration (50 pps, 0.5 mm) was applied for 30 s to the relaxed triceps brachii of the reference arm. Both arms were constrained to rotate horizontally at the elbow. Three experimental conditions were investigated: (1) vibration of the stationary reference arm, (2) slow, small passive extension or flexion of the reference arm during vibration, and (3) slow, small passive extension or flexion of the reference arm without vibration. Triceps brachii vibration at 50 pps induced an illusion of elbow flexion. The movement illusion began after several seconds, relatively fast to begin with and gradually slowing down to a stop. On average, triceps vibration produced illusory motion at an average latency of 6.3 s, amplitude of 9.7 degrees , velocity of 0.6 degrees /s, and duration of 16.4 s. During vibration, slow, small ( approximately 0.3 degrees /s, 1.3 degrees ) passive rotations of the joint dramatically enhanced, stopped, or reversed the direction of illusory movement, depending on the direction of the passive joint rotation. However, the subjects' perceptions of these passive elbow rotations were exaggerated: 2-3 times the size of the actual movement. In the absence of vibration, the subjects accurately reproduced these passive joint rotations. We discuss whether the exaggerated perception of slow, small movement during vibration is better explained by contributions of non muscle spindle Ia afferents or by changes in the mechanical transmission of vibration to the receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132974     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0034-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  Sensory integration in the perception of movements at the human metacarpophalangeal joint.

Authors:  D F Collins; K M Refshauge; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  FURTHER STUDIES OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC FUSIMOTOR FIBRES.

Authors:  A CROWE; P B MATTHEWS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Finger movement responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin of the human hand.

Authors:  B B Edin; J H Abbs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Quantitative analysis of static strain sensitivity in human mechanoreceptors from hairy skin.

Authors:  B B Edin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study.

Authors:  J P Roll; J P Vedel; E Ribot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Kinesthetic sensibility.

Authors:  D I McCloskey
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Group III and IV receptors of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  V C Abrahams
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.273

8.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Different types of slowly conducting afferent units in cat skeletal muscle and tendon.

Authors:  S Mense; H Meyer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  [Perceptive and motor effects of muscular vibrations in the normal human: demonstration of a response by opposing muscles].

Authors:  J P Roll; J C Gilhodes; M F Tardy-Gervet
Journal:  Arch Ital Biol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 1.000

View more
  17 in total

1.  Decreased variability in postural control strategies in young people with non-specific low back pain is associated with altered proprioceptive reweighting.

Authors:  Kurt Claeys; Simon Brumagne; Wim Dankaerts; Henri Kiers; Lotte Janssens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The illusion of changed position and movement from vibrating one arm is altered by vision or movement of the other arm.

Authors:  Masahiko Izumizaki; Mikio Tsuge; Lena Akai; Uwe Proske; Ikuo Homma
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Modulation of proprioceptive inflow when initiating a step influences postural adjustments.

Authors:  Hélène Ruget; Jean Blouin; Thelma Coyle; Laurence Mouchnino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Ankle proprioception is not targeted by exercises on an unstable surface.

Authors:  Henri Kiers; Simon Brumagne; Jaap van Dieën; Philip van der Wees; Luc Vanhees
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The effect of acute back muscle fatigue on postural control strategy in people with and without recurrent low back pain.

Authors:  Ege Johanson; Simon Brumagne; Lotte Janssens; Madelon Pijnenburg; Kurt Claeys; Mati Pääsuke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Persons with recurrent low back pain exhibit a rigid postural control strategy.

Authors:  Simon Brumagne; Lotte Janssens; Stefanie Knapen; Kurt Claeys; Ege Suuden-Johanson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Reduced effects of tendon vibration with increased task demand during active, cyclical ankle movements.

Authors:  Lisa M Floyd; Taylor C Holmes; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Bimanual coupling effect during a proprioceptive stimulation.

Authors:  M Biggio; A Bisio; F Garbarini; Marco Bove
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Proprioceptive changes impair balance control in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Lotte Janssens; Simon Brumagne; Alison K McConnell; Kurt Claeys; Madelon Pijnenburg; Chris Burtin; Wim Janssens; Marc Decramer; Thierry Troosters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Microstructural integrity of the superior cerebellar peduncle is associated with an impaired proprioceptive weighting capacity in individuals with non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Madelon Pijnenburg; Karen Caeyenberghs; Lotte Janssens; Nina Goossens; Stephan P Swinnen; Stefan Sunaert; Simon Brumagne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.