Literature DB >> 24096028

Switching auditory attention using spatial and non-spatial features recruits different cortical networks.

Eric Larson1, Adrian K C Lee.   

Abstract

Switching attention between different stimuli of interest based on particular task demands is important in many everyday settings. In audition in particular, switching attention between different speakers of interest that are talking concurrently is often necessary for effective communication. Recently, it has been shown by multiple studies that auditory selective attention suppresses the representation of unwanted streams in auditory cortical areas in favor of the target stream of interest. However, the neural processing that guides this selective attention process is not well understood. Here we investigated the cortical mechanisms involved in switching attention based on two different types of auditory features. By combining magneto- and electro-encephalography (M-EEG) with an anatomical MRI constraint, we examined the cortical dynamics involved in switching auditory attention based on either spatial or pitch features. We designed a paradigm where listeners were cued in the beginning of each trial to switch or maintain attention halfway through the presentation of concurrent target and masker streams. By allowing listeners time to switch during a gap in the continuous target and masker stimuli, we were able to isolate the mechanisms involved in endogenous, top-down attention switching. Our results show a double dissociation between the involvement of right temporoparietal junction (RTPJ) and the left inferior parietal supramarginal part (LIPSP) in tasks requiring listeners to switch attention based on space and pitch features, respectively, suggesting that switching attention based on these features involves at least partially separate processes or behavioral strategies.
© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory attention; Electroencephalography; Inferior parietal supramarginal part; LIPSP; M-EEG; Magneto- and electroencephalography; Magnetoencephalography; Pitch processing; RTPJ; Right temporoparietal junction; STS; Spatial attention; Temporoparietal junction; left inferior parietal supramarginal part; superior temporal sulcus

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24096028      PMCID: PMC3856289          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  40 in total

1.  Auditory attention to space and frequency activates similar cerebral systems.

Authors:  R J Zatorre; T A Mondor; A C Evans
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.

Authors:  Dahlia Sharon; Matti S Hämäläinen; Roger B H Tootell; Eric Halgren; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation.

Authors:  A Molins; S M Stufflebeam; E N Brown; M S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Distinct pathways involved in sound recognition and localization: a human fMRI study.

Authors:  P P Maeder; R A Meuli; M Adriani; A Bellmann; E Fornari; J P Thiran; A Pittet; S Clarke
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a 'haircut'.

Authors:  Gerard R Ridgway; Vladimir Litvak; Guillaume Flandin; Karl J Friston; Will D Penny
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  12 in total

1.  Neural Switch Asymmetry in Feature-Based Auditory Attention Tasks.

Authors:  Susan A McLaughlin; Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-23

Review 2.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Leveraging anatomical information to improve transfer learning in brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Mark Wronkiewicz; Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Cognitive control and midline theta adjust across multiple timescales.

Authors:  Lisa K Chinn; Carolyn S Pauker; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Effects of age on electrophysiological correlates of speech processing in a dynamic "cocktail-party" situation.

Authors:  Stephan Getzmann; Christina Hanenberg; Jörg Lewald; Michael Falkenstein; Edmund Wascher
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Mock; Michael J Seay; Danielle R Charney; John L Holmes; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Supramodal executive control of attention.

Authors:  Alfredo Spagna; Melissa-Ann Mackie; Jin Fan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-24

8.  Spatial Release From Informational Masking: Evidence From Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Yu-Lan Mary Ying; Antje Ihlefeld
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  The Effects of Switching Non-Spatial Attention During Conversational Turn Taking.

Authors:  Gaven Lin; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Potential Use of MEG to Understand Abnormalities in Auditory Function in Clinical Populations.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.