Literature DB >> 14658019

Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.

Massimo Turatto1, Giovanni Galfano, Bruce Bridgeman, Carlo Umiltà.   

Abstract

Extending previous evidence for attentional shifts across auditory and visual modalities without the confound of the two modalities originating at different locations (Turatto et al. 2002), we investigated attention shifts between auditory and tactile modalities, and between tactile and visual modalities. Two stimuli (S1 and S2), either in the same or in different modalities, were delivered from the same spatial source and were separated by a variable temporal gap. S1 was task irrelevant, whereas S2 required a speeded discrimination. Results showed that modality switching is detrimental independently of the stimulated modality as long as the temporal lag between S1 and S2 is short enough that there is not time to switch attention before S2 is delivered. We observed automatic, modality-driven, attentional capture, with ipsimodal trials leading to faster response times than crossmodal trials. The present results cannot be accounted for by spatial artifacts, response priming or criterion shifts, and are interpreted as the consequence of a space-independent attentional shift across sensory modalities.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14658019     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1724-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

1.  Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs.

Authors:  S Kennett; M Eimer; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  On asymmetries in cross-modal spatial attention orienting.

Authors:  L M Ward; J J McDonald; D Lin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-08

3.  Crossmodal links in spatial attention are mediated by supramodal control processes: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; José Van Velzen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Positron-emission tomography studies of cross-modality inhibition in selective attentional tasks: closing the "mind's eye".

Authors:  R Kawashima; B T O'Sullivan; P E Roland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The attention system of the human brain.

Authors:  M I Posner; S E Petersen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention.

Authors:  M Eimer; E Schröger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance.

Authors:  M I Posner; M J Nissen; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.

Authors:  M Schmitt; A Postma; E De Haan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-02
View more
  15 in total

1.  Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows.

Authors:  Giovanni Galfano; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Biasing the brain's attentional set: I. cue driven deployments of intersensory selective attention.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Gregory V Simpson; Seppo P Ahlfors; Clifford D Saron
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Daniel Sanabria; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Auditory-motor and cognitive aspects in area 8B of macaque monkey's frontal cortex: a premotor ear-eye field (PEEF).

Authors:  C Lucchetti; M Lanzilotto; L Bon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mozolic; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Ann M Peiffer; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Oscillatory alpha-band mechanisms and the deployment of spatial attention to anticipated auditory and visual target locations: supramodal or sensory-specific control mechanisms?

Authors:  Snigdha Banerjee; Adam C Snyder; Sophie Molholm; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.

Authors:  Alicia Leiva; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Pilar Andrés
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-23

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective attention in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Kristjana Hysaj; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Audiotactile interactions in near and far space.

Authors:  Norimichi Kitagawa; Massimiliano Zampini; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visual statistical learning is not reliably modulated by selective attention to isolated events.

Authors:  Elizabeth Musz; Matthew J Weber; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.