Literature DB >> 15616811

Examining the crossmodal consequences of viewing the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Alberto Gallace1, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

For many years, the Müller-Lyer illusion was studied as a purely "visual" illusion, but like many other optical illusions, the evidence now shows that it also occurs when stimuli are presented tactually. In the present study, we investigated whether the visual perception of the illusion would have any crossmodal consequences for haptic perception. The wings-in and wings-out parts of the Müller-Lyer illusion were placed end-to-end, sharing a central fin. This Brentano version of the illusion was presented visually on a screen in front of the participants, who had to compare the "felt" length of two sticks placed on the back of the screen, one behind either part of the illusion. Our results show that the presentation of the visual illusion modified the felt lengths of the sticks presented directly behind the illusion. In particular, the stick presented on the side of space perceived visually as being shorter (behind the wings-in part of the display) was perceived as longer, and vice versa for the stick mounted behind the space perceived visually as longer (behind the wings-out part of the display). These results highlight the crossmodal consequences of the visual perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion for the haptic perception of line length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15616811     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2130-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  The Müller-Lyer illusion in touch and vision: implications for multisensory processes.

Authors:  Susanna Millar; Zainab Al-Attar
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-04

2.  Constant errors in the measurement of figural after-effects.

Authors:  M WERTHEIMER
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1954-09

3.  The destruction of the Müller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: an examination of 2 theories.

Authors:  W KOHLER; J FISHBACK
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1950-04

4.  Effects of gender on perception of spatial illusions.

Authors:  M E Pratarelli; B J Steitz
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1995-04

5.  Visuospatial neglect in normal subjects: altered spatial representations induced by a perceptual illusion.

Authors:  J Fleming; M Behrmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Grasping an illusion.

Authors:  E Daprati; M Gentilucci
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Mueller-Lyer illusion by the blind.

Authors:  L S Tsai
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1967-10

8.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task.

Authors:  D Bowers; K M Heilman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Vertical and bisection bias in active touch.

Authors:  S Millar; Z al-Attar
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.