Literature DB >> 15471772

Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality.

Karen R Sepucha1, Floyd J Fowler, Albert G Mulley.   

Abstract

The phenomenon of practice variation draws attention to the need for better management of clinical decision making as a means of ensuring quality. Different policies to address variations, including guidelines and measures of appropriateness, have had little demonstrable impact on variation itself or on the underlying quality problems. Variations in rates of interventions raise questions about the patient-centeredness of decisions that determine what care is provided to whom. Policies that support the development and routine use of measures of decision quality will provide opportunities to measurably improve the quality of decisions, thereby leading to more patient-centered and efficient health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15471772     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  87 in total

1.  The role of perceived benefits and costs in patients' medical decisions.

Authors:  Eleanor Singer; Mick P Couper; Angela Fagerlin; Floyd J Fowler; Carrie A Levin; Peter A Ubel; John Van Hoewyk; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Conjoint analysis: a 'new' way to evaluate patients' preferences.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Informed consent for clinical treatment.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Allan V Prochazka; Aaron S Fink
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Oncology residents' perspectives on communication skills and shared decision making.

Authors:  Rajiv Samant; Inge Aivas; Jean-Marc Bourque; Tara Tucker
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Does physician communication style impact patient report of decision quality for breast cancer treatment?

Authors:  Kathryn A Martinez; Ken Resnicow; Geoffrey C Williams; Marlene Silva; Paul Abrahamse; Dean A Shumway; Lauren P Wallner; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-06-22

6.  Shared decision-making: the debate continues.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Comparison of Three Measures of Shared Decision Making: SDM Process_4, CollaboRATE, and SURE Scales.

Authors:  Suzanne Brodney; Floyd J Fowler; Michael J Barry; Yuchiao Chang; Karen Sepucha
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Communication and decision making in cancer care: setting research priorities for decision support/patients' decision aids.

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Ellen M Peters; Laura Siminoff; E Dale Collins; Michael J Barry
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Do variations in provider discussions explain socioeconomic disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction?

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Eric C Schneider; Stuart R Lipsitz; Clifford Y Ko; Jennifer L Malin; Arnold M Epstein; Jane C Weeks; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.