Literature DB >> 9104377

Offering choice of surgical treatment to women with breast cancer.

L Fallowfield1.   

Abstract

Much has been written about the psychosocial and sexual dysfunction associated with the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Hopes that breast conserving techniques would lead to a reduction in some of the psychosocial morbidity experienced, have not materialised. Most of the methodologically sound studies reported to date demonstrate few differences in quality of life domains between women whatever their primary surgical treatment. Some researchers suggested that if women were offered an opportunity to select the surgical option they preferred, then two things would occur: (1) women would choose breast-conserving techniques, and (2) choice in itself would prevent psychosocial morbidity. Despite strong support for both of these assumptions, neither have been borne out. Significant numbers of women, when offered choice, opt for mastectomy and choice in itself does not convey protection from psychological morbidity. The majority of women seem to welcome being given clear information about the options available, together with the reasons as to why a clinician would advise one policy rather than another. However, fewer women than expected wish to take a major role in decision-making about their breast cancer treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9104377     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(96)00947-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  10 in total

Review 1.  Psychiatric morbidity in breast cancer--a review.

Authors:  B Farragher
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Understanding surgery choices for breast cancer: how might the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Common Sense Model contribute to decision support interventions?

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Antony S R Manstead
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Patient education and decision making in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Lior Heller; Michael J Miller
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Effect of different forms of information produced for cancer patients on their use of the information, social support, and anxiety: randomised trial.

Authors:  R B Jones; J Pearson; A J Cawsey; D Bental; A Barrett; J White; C A White; W H Gilmour
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-05

5.  Satisfaction with care among low-income women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Lalima Hoq; Allison Diamant; Rose C Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Doctors' communication of trust, care, and respect in breast cancer: qualitative study.

Authors:  Emma Burkitt Wright; Christopher Holcombe; Peter Salmon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-30

7.  Are patients making high-quality decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy? [outcomes article].

Authors:  Clara N Lee; Jeff Belkora; Yuchiao Chang; Beverly Moy; Ann Partridge; Karen Sepucha
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Revision Surgery to Improve Cosmesis with Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  R Clough; L Darragh; L Maclennan; J M O'Donoghue
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-05-21

9.  The impact of the perception of treatment choice on satisfaction with treatment, experienced chemotherapy burden and current quality of life.

Authors:  S J T Jansen; W Otten; C J H van de Velde; J W R Nortier; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Factors influencing the surgery intentions and choices of women with early breast cancer: the predictive utility of an extended theory of planned behaviour.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Adrian Edwards; Antony S R Manstead
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.796

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.