Literature DB >> 10878834

Do they listen? A review of information retained by patients following consent for reduction mammoplasty.

Y Godwin1.   

Abstract

For valid informed consent the nature, purpose and material risks of the proposed procedure must be discussed. This study aims to clarify how much of this information is retained by the competent patient who gives written consent for reduction mammoplasty. A total of 38 patients were taken through specific and general factors relating to reduction mammoplasty by their surgeon at the time of obtaining consent. Six days following surgery they were asked how many facts they had retained. They were also asked to grade their surgeon on his/her ability at obtaining an informed consent and to suggest anything they felt would make consent clearer. The overall recall of facts by the patients was poor. The average number of retained facts was three out of twelve mentioned. Despite poor recall, 97% of the patients felt that the procedure of obtaining consent was adequate. 63% of patients gave the procedure for obtaining consent maximal score suggesting they were entirely satisfied. 74% would have liked some visual back-up at the time of giving their consent such as a photograph. Consent is a two-way process with clear information from the doctor and the understanding of that information by the patient. Despite poor retention of this information, patients in this study felt they had received clear information allowing written consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10878834     DOI: 10.1054/bjps.1999.3220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Plast Surg        ISSN: 0007-1226


  24 in total

1.  Improving consultations in general practice for non English-speaking patients.

Authors:  Margot Jackson; John Skinner
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  What do patients really want to know in an informed consent procedure? A questionnaire-based survey of patients in the Bath area, UK.

Authors:  H El-Wakeel; G J Taylor; J J T Tate
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The patient's perioperative perspective during the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a pilot study.

Authors:  Megan A Rudolph; Janine M Rotsides; Philip E Zapanta
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Antiretroviral Non-Adherence is Associated With a Retrieval Profile of Deficits in Verbal Episodic Memory.

Authors:  Lisa C Obermeit; Erin E Morgan; Kaitlin B Casaletto; Igor Grant; Steven Paul Woods
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Impact of the informed consent process on patients' understanding of varicose veins and their treatment.

Authors:  M F Dillon; C J Carr; T M F Feeley; S Tierney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  A Storytelling Approach: Insights from the Shambaa.

Authors:  Camillo Lamanna
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2018-09

7.  Underuse of breast cancer adjuvant treatment: patient knowledge, beliefs, and medical mistrust.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jessica Weidmann; Kezhen Fei; Jenny J Lin; Howard Leventhal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.

Authors:  Wouter K G Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Marc R M Scheltinga; Paul H M Spauwen; Gert-Jan van der Wilt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Postoperative laparoscopic bariatric surgery patients do not remember potential complications.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; David S Tichansky; Raymond J Taddeucci
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Rating the preferences for potential harms of treatments for cardiovascular disease: a survey of community-dwelling adults.

Authors:  Guangxiang Zhang; Puja B Parikh; Soraya Zabihi; David L Brown
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.