Literature DB >> 21197124

Home birth matters-for all women.

Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong1.   

Abstract

Although it remains rare in the United States, planned home birth has drawn increasing attention and criticism in the mainstream media and has come under attack from organized medicine. Yet, recent peer-reviewed studies contribute to the evidence base supporting home birth as a safe option for low-risk women attended by skilled midwives. The author of this editorial argues that home birth is an important cultural touchstone in the landscape of American maternity care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advocacy; home birth; maternity care; natural birth

Year:  2010        PMID: 21197124      PMCID: PMC2820352          DOI: 10.1624/105812410X482329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Educ        ISSN: 1058-1243


  8 in total

1.  Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births.

Authors:  A de Jonge; B Y van der Goes; A C J Ravelli; M P Amelink-Verburg; B W Mol; J G Nijhuis; J Bennebroek Gravenhorst; S E Buitendijk
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Home versus hospital deliveries: follow up study of matched pairs for procedures and outcome. Zurich Study Team.

Authors:  U Ackermann-Liebrich; T Voegeli; K Günter-Witt; I Kunz; M Züllig; C Schindler; M Maurer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-23

3.  Outcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in The Netherlands.

Authors:  T A Wiegers; M J Keirse; J van der Zee; G A Berghs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-23

4.  Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia.

Authors:  Patricia A Janssen; Shoo K Lee; Elizabeth M Ryan; Duncan J Etches; Duncan F Farquharson; Donlim Peacock; Michael C Klein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Outcomes of intended home births in nurse-midwifery practice: a prospective descriptive study.

Authors:  P A Murphy; J Fullerton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study.

Authors:  Helena E Lindgren; Ingela J Rådestad; Kyllike Christensson; Ingegerd M Hildingsson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Staying home to give birth: why women in the United States choose home birth.

Authors:  Debora Boucher; Catherine Bennett; Barbara McFarlin; Rixa Freeze
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.

Authors:  Patricia A Janssen; Lee Saxell; Lesley A Page; Michael C Klein; Robert M Liston; Shoo K Lee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Autonomy in place of birth: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Berglind Halfdansdottir; Margaret E Wilson; Ingegerd Hildingsson; Olof A Olafsdottir; Alexander Kr Smarason; Herdis Sveinsdottir
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-11

2.  The Impacts of COVID-19 on US Maternity Care Practices: A Followup Study.

Authors:  Kim Gutschow; Robbie Davis-Floyd
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-05-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.