Literature DB >> 8942693

Outcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in The Netherlands.

T A Wiegers1, M J Keirse, J van der Zee, G A Berghs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relation between the intended place of birth (home or hospital) and perinatal outcome in women with low risk pregnancies after controlling for parity and social, medical, and obstetric background.
DESIGN: Analysis of prospective data from midwives and their clients.
SETTING: 54 midwifery practices in the province of Gelderland, Netherlands.
SUBJECTS: 97 midwives and 1836 women with low risk pregnancies who had planned to give birth at home or in hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Perinatal outcome index based on "maximal result with minimal intervention" and incorporating 22 items on childbirth, 9 on the condition of the newborn, and 5 on the mother after the birth.
RESULTS: There was no relation between the planned place of birth and perinatal outcome in primiparous women when controlling for a favourable or less favourable background. In multiparous women, perinatal outcome was significantly better for planned home births than for planned hospital births, with or without control for background variables.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of planned home births is at least as good as that of planned hospital births in women at low risk receiving midwifery care in the Netherlands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8942693      PMCID: PMC2352715          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  8 in total

1.  Home births and minimal medical interventions.

Authors:  P E Treffers; M Eskes; G Kleiverda; D van Alten
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  An approach to measuring quality of midwifery care.

Authors:  T A Wiegers; M J Keirse; G A Berghs; J van der Zee
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  The profession of midwife in The Netherlands.

Authors:  E van Teijlingen; P McCaffery
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.372

4.  Maternal anxiety and obstetric complications.

Authors:  A J Crandon
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  The Cochrane Lecture. The best and the enemy of the good: randomised controlled trials, uncertainty, and assessing the role of patient choice in medical decision making.

Authors:  K McPherson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  The optimality concept.

Authors:  H F Prechtl
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Home confinement: the positive results in Holland.

Authors:  S M Damstra-Wijmenga
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1984-08

8.  Obstetrical condition and neonatal neurological morbidity. An analysis with the help of the optimality concept.

Authors:  B C Touwen; H J Huisjes; A D Jurgens-van der Zee; M E Bierman-van Eendenburg; M Smrkovsky; A A Olinga
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.079

  8 in total
  25 in total

1.  Are home births safe?

Authors:  Régis Blais
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Pharmacotherapy in the perinatal period--an exploratory study in midwifery.

Authors:  H Tobi; E Schirm; A M Verdegaal; L T de Jong-vd Berg
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2001-12

3.  The pleasures of home birth?

Authors:  Liz Okon; M A Okon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Medicalization and obstetric care: an analysis of developments in Dutch midwifery.

Authors:  Anke D J Smeenk; Henk A M J ten Have
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2003

5.  Home birth matters-for all women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

6.  Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.

Authors:  Kenneth C Johnson; Betty-Anne Daviss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-18

7.  The safety of home birth: is the evidence good enough?

Authors:  Helen McLachlan; Della Forster
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Home birth.

Authors:  N P Springer; C Van Weel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-23

9.  Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: population based study.

Authors:  H Bastian; M J Keirse; P A Lancaster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-08

10.  Cost analysis of the Dutch obstetric system: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth--a prospective non-randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Marijke Jc Hendrix; Silvia Maa Evers; Marloes Cm Basten; Jan G Nijhuis; Johan L Severens
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.