Literature DB >> 18607818

Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study.

Helena E Lindgren1, Ingela J Rådestad, Kyllike Christensson, Ingegerd M Hildingsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this population-based study was to measure the risk of adverse outcome for mother and child in planned home births in a Swedish population irrespective of where the birth actually occurred, at home or in hospital after transfer.
DESIGN: A population-based study using data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register.
SETTING: Sweden 1992-2004. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 897 planned home births were compared with a randomly selected group of 11,341 planned hospital births. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of mortality and morbidity among mothers and children, emergency conditions, instrumental and operative delivery and perineal lacerations were compared.
RESULTS: During this period in Sweden the neonatal mortality rate was 2.2 per thousand in the home birth group and 0.7 in the hospital group (RR 3.6, 95% CI 0.2-14.7). No cases of emergency complications were found in the home birth group. The risk of having a sphincter rupture was lower in the planned home birth group (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.0-0.7). The risk of having a cesarean section (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7) or instrumental delivery (RR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5) was significantly lower in the planned home birth group.
CONCLUSION: In Sweden, between 1992 and 2004, the intrapartum and neonatal mortality in planned home births was 2.2 per thousand. The proportion is higher compared to hospital births but no statistically significant difference was found. Women in the home birth group more often experienced a spontaneous birth without medical intervention and were less likely to sustain pelvic floor injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18607818     DOI: 10.1080/00016340802199903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  23 in total

1.  Home birth matters-for all women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

2.  The safety of home birth: is the evidence good enough?

Authors:  Helen McLachlan; Della Forster
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.

Authors:  Patricia A Janssen; Lee Saxell; Lesley A Page; Michael C Klein; Robert M Liston; Shoo K Lee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Severe adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in the Netherlands: nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Ank de Jonge; Jeanette A J M Mesman; Judith Manniën; Joost J Zwart; Jeroen van Dillen; Jos van Roosmalen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-06-13

5.  Fear causes tears - perineal injuries in home birth settings. A Swedish interview study.

Authors:  Helena E Lindgren; Åsa Brink; Marie Klinberg-Allvin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Peter Brocklehurst; Pollyanna Hardy; Jennifer Hollowell; Louise Linsell; Alison Macfarlane; Christine McCourt; Neil Marlow; Alison Miller; Mary Newburn; Stavros Petrou; David Puddicombe; Maggie Redshaw; Rachel Rowe; Jane Sandall; Louise Silverton; Mary Stewart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-11-23

7.  Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in woman at low risk of complications: evidence from the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Schroeder; Stavros Petrou; Nishma Patel; Jennifer Hollowell; David Puddicombe; Maggie Redshaw; Peter Brocklehurst
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-04-18

Review 8.  The effect of health facility delivery on neonatal mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gurmesa Tura; Mesganaw Fantahun; Alemayehu Worku
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Lesley A Smith; Natalia Price; Vanessa Simonite; Ethel E Burns
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities.

Authors:  Ruth Zielinski; Kelly Ackerson; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.