Literature DB >> 9721790

Outcomes of intended home births in nurse-midwifery practice: a prospective descriptive study.

P A Murphy1, J Fullerton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcomes of intended home birth in the practices of certified nurse-midwives.
METHODS: Twenty-nine US nurse-midwifery practices were recruited for the study in 1994. Women presenting for intended home birth in these practices were enrolled in the study from late 1994 to late 1995. Outcomes for all enrolled women were ascertained. Validity and reliability of submitted data were established.
RESULTS: Of 1404 enrolled women intending home births, 6% miscarried, terminated the pregnancy or changed plans. Another 7.4% became ineligible for home birth prior to the onset of labor at term due to the development of perinatal problems and were referred for planned hospital birth. Of those women beginning labor with the intention of delivering at home, 102 (8.3%) were transferred to the hospital during labor. Ten mothers (0.8%) were transferred to the hospital after delivery, and 14 infants (1.1%) were transferred after birth. Overall intrapartal fetal and neonatal mortality for women beginning labor with the intention of delivering at home was 2.5 per 1000. For women actually delivering at home, intrapartal fetal and neonatal mortality was 1.8 per 1000.
CONCLUSION: Home birth can be accomplished with good outcomes under the care of qualified practitioners and within a system that facilitates transfer to hospital care when necessary. Intrapartal mortality during intended home birth is concentrated in postdates pregnancies with evidence of meconium passage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9721790     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00182-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  10 in total

1.  Data on babies' safety during hospital births are being ignored.

Authors:  J Drife
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-09

2.  The midwife as an "Instrument" of care.

Authors:  Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Home birth matters-for all women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

4.  UK childbirth delivery options in 2001-2002: alternatives to consultant unit booking and delivery.

Authors:  Lindsay Fp Smith; Caroline P Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Accuracy of birth certificate and hospital discharge data: a certified nurse-midwife and physician comparison.

Authors:  Heather M Bradford; Vicky Cárdenas; Katherine Camacho-Carr; Mona T Lydon-Rochelle
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-02-06

6.  Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.

Authors:  Kenneth C Johnson; Betty-Anne Daviss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-18

7.  Pivoting to Childbirth at Home or in Freestanding Birth Centers in the US During COVID-19: Safety, Economics and Logistics.

Authors:  Betty-Anne Daviss; David A Anderson; Kenneth C Johnson
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-03-26

8.  Unattended Home Labor until Complete Cervical Dilatation Ending with Hospital Delivery: Analysis of 238 Pregnancies.

Authors:  Ozlem Gun Eryilmaz; Nasuh Utku Dogan; Cavidan Gulerman; Leyla Mollamahmutoglu; Nedim Cicek; Ruya Deveer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-02-26

9.  Outcomes for births booked under an independent midwife and births in NHS maternity units: matched comparison study.

Authors:  Andrew Symon; Clare Winter; Melanie Inkster; Peter T Donnan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-11

Review 10.  Transfer to hospital in planned home births: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ellen Blix; Merethe Kumle; Hanne Kjærgaard; Pål Øian; Helena E Lindgren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.007

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.