Literature DB >> 19720688

Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.

Patricia A Janssen1, Lee Saxell, Lesley A Page, Michael C Klein, Robert M Liston, Shoo K Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of planned home births attended by registered midwives have been limited by incomplete data, nonrepresentative sampling, inadequate statistical power and the inability to exclude unplanned home births. We compared the outcomes of planned home births attended by midwives with those of planned hospital births attended by midwives or physicians.
METHODS: We included all planned home births attended by registered midwives from Jan. 1, 2000, to Dec. 31, 2004, in British Columbia, Canada (n = 2889), and all planned hospital births meeting the eligibility requirements for home birth that were attended by the same cohort of midwives (n = 4752). We also included a matched sample of physician-attended planned hospital births (n = 5331). The primary outcome measure was perinatal mortality; secondary outcomes were obstetric interventions and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
RESULTS: The rate of perinatal death per 1000 births was 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00-1.03) in the group of planned home births; the rate in the group of planned hospital births was 0.57 (95% CI 0.00-1.43) among women attended by a midwife and 0.64 (95% CI 0.00-1.56) among those attended by a physician. Women in the planned home-birth group were significantly less likely than those who planned a midwife-attended hospital birth to have obstetric interventions (e.g., electronic fetal monitoring, relative risk [RR] 0.32, 95% CI 0.29-0.36; assisted vaginal delivery, RR 0.41, 95% 0.33-0.52) or adverse maternal outcomes (e.g., third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28-0.59; postpartum hemorrhage, RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.77). The findings were similar in the comparison with physician-assisted hospital births. Newborns in the home-birth group were less likely than those in the midwife-attended hospital-birth group to require resuscitation at birth (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.14-0.37) or oxygen therapy beyond 24 hours (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.24-0.59). The findings were similar in the comparison with newborns in the physician-assisted hospital births; in addition, newborns in the home-birth group were less likely to have meconium aspiration (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.93) and more likely to be admitted to hospital or readmitted if born in hospital (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.85).
INTERPRETATION: Planned home birth attended by a registered midwife was associated with very low and comparable rates of perinatal death and reduced rates of obstetric interventions and other adverse perinatal outcomes compared with planned hospital birth attended by a midwife or physician.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19720688      PMCID: PMC2742137          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  19 in total

1.  Home birth in New Zealand 1973-93: incidence and mortality.

Authors:  G Gulbransen; J Hilton; L McKay; A Cox
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1997-03-28

2.  Satisfaction with planned place of birth among midwifery clients in British Columbia.

Authors:  Patricia A Janssen; Elaine A Carty; Birgit Reime
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.

Authors:  Kenneth C Johnson; Betty-Anne Daviss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-18

4.  Experiences of Australian mothers who gave birth either at home, at a birth centre, or in hospital labour wards.

Authors:  J D Cunningham
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Outcomes of 11,788 planned home births attended by certified nurse-midwives. A retrospective descriptive study.

Authors:  R E Anderson; P A Murphy
Journal:  J Nurse Midwifery       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec

6.  Incidence and causes of severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in Canada.

Authors:  Michael Sgro; Douglas Campbell; Vibhuti Shah
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Birth at home.

Authors:  G Chamberlain; A Wraight; P Crowley
Journal:  Pract Midwife       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

8.  Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Alison G Cahill; David M Stamilio; Anthony O Odibo; Jeffrey F Peipert; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Erika J Stevens; Mary D Sammel; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Licensed midwife-attended, out-of-hospital births in Washington state: are they safe?

Authors:  P A Janssen; V L Holt; S J Myers
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.689

10.  Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study.

Authors:  Helena E Lindgren; Ingela J Rådestad; Kyllike Christensson; Ingegerd M Hildingsson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.636

View more
  61 in total

1.  Home birth matters-for all women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

2.  Interpreting evidence: why values can matter as much as science.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Kristen Intemann
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.416

3.  Outcomes associated with planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Eileen K Hutton; Adriana Cappelletti; Angela H Reitsma; Julia Simioni; Jordyn Horne; Caroline McGregor; Rashid J Ahmed
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Policy statement on planned home birth: upholding the best interests of children and families.

Authors:  Kristi L Watterberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  The safety of home birth: is the evidence good enough?

Authors:  Helen McLachlan; Della Forster
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Smoking status and planned hospital births.

Authors:  Enrique F Barros
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Stillbirths before 28 weeks?

Authors:  Amy B Tuteur
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Unexpected complications of low-risk pregnancies in the United States.

Authors:  Valery A Danilack; Anthony P Nunes; Maureen G Phipps
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Expert workshop assesses the significance of birth location on maternal and infant outcomes.

Authors:  Wendy Gordon
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

10.  Childbirth Education Prior to Pregnancy? Survey Findings of Childbirth Preferences and Attitudes Among Young Women.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Taylor Cwiertniewicz; Kathrin Stoll
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.