Literature DB >> 25641663

Autonomy in place of birth: a concept analysis.

Berglind Halfdansdottir1, Margaret E Wilson2, Ingegerd Hildingsson3,4,5, Olof A Olafsdottir6, Alexander Kr Smarason7, Herdis Sveinsdottir6.   

Abstract

This article examines one of the relevant concepts in the current debate on home birth-autonomy in place of birth-and its uses in general language, ethics, and childbirth health care literature. International discussion on childbirth services. A concept analysis guided by the model of Walker and Avant. The authors suggest that autonomy in the context of choosing place of birth is defined by three main attributes: information, capacity and freedom; given the antecedent of not harming others, and the consequences of accountability for the outcome. Model, borderline and contrary cases of autonomy in place of birth are presented. A woman choosing place of birth is autonomous if she receives all relevant information on available choices, risks and benefits, is capable of understanding and processing the information and choosing place of birth in the absence of coercion, provided she intends no harm to others and is accountable for the outcome. The attributes of the definition can serve as a useful tool for pregnant women, midwives, and other health professionals in contemplating their moral status and discussing place of birth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy; Choice; Concept analysis; Home birth; Midwifery; Place of birth

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25641663     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-015-9624-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  38 in total

1.  Home birth--proceed with caution.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth.

Authors:  Ole Olsen; Jette A Clausen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

3.  Negotiating control and meaning: home birth as a self-constructed choice in Finland.

Authors:  K Viisainen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 476: planned home birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Obstetric ethics: an essential dimension of planned home birth.

Authors:  Frank A Chervenak; Laurence B McCullough; Birgit Arabin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  A reconsideration of home birth in the United States.

Authors:  Howard Minkoff; Jeffrey Ecker
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2013

7.  Facilitating women's choice in maternity care.

Authors:  Marianne Nieuwenhuijze; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2013

Review 8.  Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.

Authors:  Jane Sandall; Hora Soltani; Simon Gates; Andrew Shennan; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-21

9.  Preferred place of birth: characteristics and motives of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Tamar van Haaren-Ten Haken; Marijke Hendrix; Marianne Nieuwenhuijze; Luc Budé; Raymond de Vries; Jan Nijhuis
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.372

10.  Perceptions of risk and risk management among 735 women who opted for a home birth.

Authors:  Helena E Lindgren; Ingela J Rådestad; Kyllike Christensson; Kristina Wally-Bystrom; Ingegerd M Hildingsson
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.372

View more
  1 in total

1.  A true choice of place of birth? Swiss women's access to birth hospitals and birth centers.

Authors:  Sebastian Rauch; Louisa Arnold; Zelda Stuerner; Juergen Rauh; Michael Rost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.